WHY DO WE EVEN HAVE A BILL OF RIGHTS?

Delta is reminding prospective flight attendants that they must wear 'proper' underwear to their interviews

(Thanks to Ron Wylie and Barry Nester)

Comments

[Madonna]

Define "proper" vs. "improper" underwear, OK?

[Elaine Benes]

So, if you've performed at a tittie bar does that count as prior experience?

[Jim]

"...the airline also reminded interviewees in that document that profanities should not be used during the interviews, that chewing gum is not permitted, and that flight attendant hopefuls must maintain their personal hygiene...

"Successful applicants... undergo seven weeks of training."

Finishing school?

[The Real Barry]

"The document reminded candidates to wear undergarments that are not visible" - I'm all for that! Think of the money we'd save on X-ray goggles!

[Mad Hatter]

I bet they’re not allowed to “really move their tail for us” anymore, either.

[MOTW]

Gracie Hart: You really think the judges are going to be looking that closely?

[Rod]

I remember the days when "proper attire" was the hot pants war between Southwest and Braniff. Sigh....

[wanderer2575]

One more way that flying is far less enjoyable than it used to be.

[man tom]

"I've reviewed your application and see no evidence of your underwear being visible."

"So, do I move on to the virtual tryout?"

"First, I have one question about your application."

"Yes?"

"When you say, 'I have a lot of experience with amphibians' do you feel that will help you fulfill your job as a flight attendant?"

[Pullet Surprise]

But what about on-the-job underwear?