THIS EXPLAINS A LOT

Scientists Discovered Something Kinda Alarming: The Universe Shouldn't Actually Exist

(Thanks to EricY and Barry Nester)

Comments

[anthony stewart]

Somewhere in space, a bunch of aliens are laughing their heads off (assuming they have one)

[gobsmacked out in the Higgs field]

Coincidentally, the research grants used to arrive at this conclusion shouldn't actually exist either.

[GJ]

Coincidentally, the scientists who arrived at this conclusion shouldn't actually exist either.

[Albert Einstein]

This also means that squirrels and humorist blogs shouldn't exist, which explains so much.

[Clankie]

" Bubbling of the Higgs Field " sounds like something that might happen after consuming a hamburger purchased at a Mall food court.

[man tom]

I was prepared for it when I began reading. The discussion of the origin of the universe came up. Black Holes immediately tossed into the mix. What about those annoying constellations? As far as the case the universe should not actually exist, the constellations would still be here. One of the great mysteries of the origin of mankind. Let me explain. We were derived from one of the Dippers. The question is which one?

Take that scientists.

[Farmer Dell]

Higgs field?

About 4 mile down the road.

Beware the bull.

[Duncan McOckiner]

Our 'universe' is a byproduct of the 'BIG BANG', a theory promulgated by the late Dr. Ruth and Hugh Hefner.

[The Real Barry]

Just confirms what Bishop Berkeley said. He's the one who first raised the question about the tree that falls in the forest when noone is there to hear it. He argued that nothing exists, not us, not the world or the universe. We're all just ideas in the mind of God.

[Florida Man]

Did the good bishop have an opinion as to how many angels could dance on the head of a pin?

[Pullet Surprise]

Or how many angels can play on a diamond?

[C. “Thunder Lizard “ Robbin]

God must be having a migraine.