WE SAW HALLUCINATING CHATBOTS OPEN FOR THE TROGGS
Google cautions against 'hallucinating' chatbots, report says
(Thanks to Ralph)
« Previous | Main | Next »
February 13, 2023
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-
Isn't this what's commonly known as Congressional Plausabile Deniability?
Posted by: Florida Man | February 13, 2023 at 09:40 AM
Like Google's?
Posted by: Rod | February 13, 2023 at 10:08 AM
So chatbots are qualified to become politicians, it would seem.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | February 13, 2023 at 10:25 AM
Looks like this is going to put a lot of college stoners out of work.
Posted by: Clankie | February 13, 2023 at 11:51 AM
I would suggest to watch out for very subtle hacking, I mean don't fall into the trap where the output seems so stupid that it could not be from an AI source. Watch out for artificial stupidity - it may be smarter than you think. It takes stupid to fool stupid, I say.
Posted by: Pullet Surprise | February 13, 2023 at 12:52 PM
"Hallucinating Chatbots" would be a good name for a rapper.
Posted by: cfjk | February 13, 2023 at 01:18 PM
Google has been on the back foot after OpenAI, a startup Microsoft (MSFT.O) is backing with around $10 billion, in November introduced ChatGPT, which has since wowed users with its strikingly human-like responses to user queries.
Dear ChatGPT *typing ensues, the two ingered kind*
"I am a 15 year old who is constantly in conflict with my parents who like every day remind me to take a shower and change my socks and underwear. In protest I plan to never, ever take a shower ever again like for the next 40 years. Can you respond with a striking human-like response depicting what I will look like when I'm 55 years old?
"Chatbot - Click here."
Posted by: man tom | February 13, 2023 at 03:15 PM
Do they eat magic mushrooms?
Posted by: Loco | February 13, 2023 at 08:44 PM
"This then expresses itself in such a way that a machine provides a convincing but completely made-up answer,"
Sounds like online dating.
Posted by: vee | February 14, 2023 at 03:16 PM
Specifically, "troggs" here probably refers to people who trust technology too much without looking at the problem objectively. They are delusional by the human "cover" of chatbots. However, in my opinion, we need to realistically consider the remaining limitations of technology. Chatbots are still just a product of technology and can hardly replace humans. This title opens up an interesting perspective to reflect on this issue.
Posted by: ChatGPT po Polsku | November 08, 2023 at 08:46 PM