WAIT... IS THAT WRONG?
(Thanks to Unholy Slacker)
« Previous | Main | Next »
(Thanks to Unholy Slacker)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Alledgedly! Presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, but nowhere in the Constitution does it mention Pringles cans.
Posted by: cfjk | November 29, 2022 at 04:29 PM
Fine print on the can: No deposit, no return
Posted by: MOTW | November 29, 2022 at 04:39 PM
Has anybody checked the can for gerbils?
Posted by: David Puddy | November 29, 2022 at 04:44 PM
His prossecutorial specialty. Defecation of character.
Posted by: man tom | November 29, 2022 at 04:58 PM
How do they know, as asserted in the article, that it was HIS feces?
Posted by: John | November 29, 2022 at 05:17 PM
Though pooping into a Pringles can is a rare skill, I suspect. The available target area of a conventional loo is take from the area of an elipse, or A= pi ab, where a and be are the short and long radii of the elipse, or approximately 110 square inches. A Pringles can opening area is given by A= pi times the square of the radius, or 7 square inches. Therefore, pooping into a Pringles can is approximately 110/7 or 15.7 times the difficulty of pooping in a conventional toilet. If the execution of this execration is "clean", the higher degree of difficulty will definitely be awarded more points by the judges, though perhaps not the by the judge assigned to this case.
Posted by: Michael | November 29, 2022 at 05:27 PM
2
Posted by: East German Judge | November 29, 2022 at 06:16 PM
Attorneys are trained to throw enough "**it" against a wall and hope that some of it sticks.
Posted by: Lionel Hutz | November 29, 2022 at 09:58 PM
I think a professional opinion is called for here - call for nursecindy. Seems feasible that a Pringle can would be ideal since it is a hollow cylinder and the offending turd is a solid cylinder. Perhaps taking it back to the store. May I speak to the store manager? Yes. I bought this can of Pringles here and look what was in the can. "No shit." Or should that be "No, shit."
Posted by: Captain11 | November 29, 2022 at 10:10 PM
@Michael - I am so glad you are here to walk us through the intricacies of this hitherto little-understood scoring system. I feel the way I did last night when I watched a video that finally explained to me the formerly-mysterious knitting technique known as intarsia.
Judging from your usage of the word loo, I expect you also harbor expertise in the field of World Cup Football. What are Japan’s chances, having beaten Germany but lost to Costa Rica? Do we have a prayer against Spain?
Posted by: Mad Hatter | November 29, 2022 at 10:46 PM
Is that their latest flavor? Poop-filled Pringles? I'll pass.
Posted by: John "Ol' Chumbucket" Baur | November 30, 2022 at 11:16 AM
Now there's a fetish for ya.
BTW, I saw Poop-Filled Pringles Can open for the Bangles.
Posted by: OldPhil | November 30, 2022 at 05:56 PM