THIS ACTUALLY MAKES PRACTICAL SENSE IN FLORIDA
(Thanks to Le Petomane)
Not just a tank: a "military style" tank.
« Previous | Main | Next »
(Thanks to Le Petomane)
Not just a tank: a "military style" tank.
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
He should mount a snowplow on it and keep the street free of frozen iguanas.
Posted by: cfjk | January 13, 2021 at 04:02 PM
Maybe it was a Mk.III Valentine gift?
(Even by my standard, this is a very niche joke)
Posted by: Not My Usual Alias | January 13, 2021 at 04:54 PM
A totally unedited version of the news report would play well on SNL.
"I'm here about thee tank?'
"There is no 'military style' tank. I wasn't expecting Martha Stewart."
Posted by: man tom | January 13, 2021 at 05:17 PM
If the guns don't work, it's just a funny-looking dune buggy.
Posted by: Rod Nunley | January 13, 2021 at 05:46 PM
This begs the question: Why can't we have civilian tanks?
Posted by: Alkali Bill | January 13, 2021 at 05:54 PM
Could have been a toilet tank.
Posted by: The Real Barry | January 13, 2021 at 06:09 PM
Tanks for the memories...
Posted by: fractalist | January 13, 2021 at 06:13 PM
Compensating for some shortcoming? A gherkin, maybe, or a pinky?
Posted by: Math-Yoda | January 13, 2021 at 06:32 PM
One thing's certain: Tanks always have the right of way.
Posted by: Le Petomane | January 13, 2021 at 07:15 PM
Good thing it wasn't a Casual Friday style tank.
Posted by: Steve (The 24 Guy) | January 13, 2021 at 08:59 PM
Cam you ever be TOO prepared?
Posted by: Lucky Jack | January 13, 2021 at 09:23 PM
Dave,
As they say in the Army, tanks for showing us this article. You need a Patton on the back for this one.
Posted by: Buzz D. | January 13, 2021 at 11:27 PM
I don't see any difference between this and some old coot having a middle age crisis in a red convertible sports car. Or motorcycle, or restored 1960's vintage muscle car. Really, I think all those who are "uncomfortable" are really just jealous that they don't have any toys that are that cool.
Posted by: 655321 | January 14, 2021 at 01:15 PM
Unfortunately the article was written by an ignoramus who thinks that "The tanks are...British grade" makes any sense whatever.
Forget about it Jake, it's CBS.
Posted by: Fred Z | January 14, 2021 at 05:36 PM
I’m just impressed that it does in fact appear to be a tank. Usually when the media calls something a “tank”, it turns out to actually be an APC or some other armored vehicle that isn’t actually a tank.
Posted by: Erik | January 15, 2021 at 10:43 PM