« Previous | Main | Next »

February 21, 2019


Ban on baring of female breasts is likely unconstitutional, 10th Circuit rules

(Thanks to Kevin Smith)


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"... no evidence of harmful fallout..."

Wink, wink. Nudge.

One of the best lines in reporting lately:
"But the nearby towns of Boulder and Denver allow female toplessness, and there is no evidence of fallout."

S'cuse me while I whip these out.

I read another article about this where several women said they didn't see a problem because men go shirtless all the time. They also said there wasn't really any difference in a shirtless man and a shirtless woman. The biggest difference I can think of is whenever I see a shirtless man I don't have the urge to say, "Hummana hummana hummana baby! Come to mama!". Unless it's someone like David Beckham and then all bets are off.

If there is a right to bare arms, why not to bare breasts ? Logic is not a 4 letter word.

Free the Nipple-Fort Collins v. City of Fort Collins. Great case name.

So any arrest would be a bust?

Was anyone else reminded of Bob & Tom's "Shirtless Girl?"

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About The Miami Herald | Advertise