GET THAT NOBEL PRIZE READY
(Thanks to Kevin Smith, Patty Villanova, Le Petomane, Ralph and coscolo, who says "device being hacked in 3... 2... 1...")
« Previous | Main | Next »
(Thanks to Kevin Smith, Patty Villanova, Le Petomane, Ralph and coscolo, who says "device being hacked in 3... 2... 1...")
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
"So, Smart Condom, how did I do?"
"Well, son, on the Stud to Dud Meter, I have to give you a 2.6 out of 10. Better luck next time."
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | November 29, 2017 at 06:19 AM
I'd be interested in what sort of user acceptance testing they did.
Posted by: JG | November 29, 2017 at 07:27 AM
Because checking tweets on your smartphone during The Moment isn't awkward enough.
Posted by: wanderer2575 | November 29, 2017 at 07:29 AM
Does it have two-factor authentication with a text message? Yes means yes.
Posted by: Ralph | November 29, 2017 at 07:50 AM
Get ready for the Mother Of All Selfies.
(And just so you know, I would never stoop to saying "Coming soon")
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | November 29, 2017 at 08:17 AM
Smart condoms: when the rubber meets the Rhodes.
Posted by: AmoebaStampede | November 29, 2017 at 08:45 AM
In my experience the women involved provide all the performance feedback I need, thank you very much!...
Posted by: Allen at Division | November 29, 2017 at 09:03 AM
If it starts booing, you know there is room for improvement.
Posted by: Rintinglen | November 29, 2017 at 09:56 AM
A computer report might be less embarrassing than enduring pointing and laughing.
Posted by: Le Petomane | November 29, 2017 at 10:04 AM
Just so it doesn't respond to "Alexa..." Would that be a 3-way?
Wasn't there a story a while ago about an Internet attached vibrator?
Posted by: Loudmouth | November 29, 2017 at 10:22 AM
How will we know if the condom is faking?
Posted by: Dale | November 29, 2017 at 11:52 AM
Another example for the use of SSL, secure socket layer, IYKWIMAITYD
Posted by: LeDud | November 29, 2017 at 12:12 PM
"Installing device driver..."
Posted by: wanderer2575 | November 29, 2017 at 12:36 PM
@AmoebaStampede- [clapping] Well done... I'm nominating that for "Comment of the Year"
Posted by: Stixnstonz | November 29, 2017 at 01:51 PM
I've found that holding up a numbered scorecard afterward works just as well.
Posted by: nursecindy | November 29, 2017 at 03:22 PM
And a 2.1 from the Bulgarian server...
Posted by: fractalist | November 29, 2017 at 03:43 PM
Soon to be a judged talent show, like American Idolatry?
But what if the smart condom is (hacked/programmed) to be a smart-ass condom? (And don't even ask how you would put it on your ass...)
Posted by: funny man | November 29, 2017 at 04:14 PM
Oh I hope it has slide whistle sound effects.
Posted by: Rudolph | November 29, 2017 at 05:21 PM
The condoms communicate using Blueball wireless technology.
Posted by: Elf Odin | November 29, 2017 at 06:11 PM
Shocking
Posted by: normnuke | November 30, 2017 at 12:16 AM
Oh, my, Stixnstonz! I hope the smart condom can say thanks on my behalf because I'm speechless. Or at least a little Trojan hoarse.
Posted by: AmoebaStampede | December 01, 2017 at 07:48 AM