WE HAVE PROVED THESE SCIENTISTS WRONG MANY TIMES
How much candy would it take to kill you? About 262 Halloween treats, scientists say
(Thanks to Craig Roberts)
« Previous | Main | Next »
October 30, 2017
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
If you steal my last fun sized Snickers you won't have a chance to try the other 261 Halloween treats, iykwim.
Posted by: nursecindy | October 30, 2017 at 01:33 PM
Challenge accepted!
Posted by: Joe | October 30, 2017 at 01:42 PM
Where do you sign up for clinical trials like this?
*makes note to not put icky licorice in nursecindy's goody bag*
Posted by: wanderer2575 | October 30, 2017 at 02:01 PM
But what if I replaced it with a fun sized toothpaste, nursecindy?
Posted by: Head_Smashed_In | October 30, 2017 at 02:31 PM
Liquor is quicker.
Posted by: Clankie | October 30, 2017 at 02:42 PM
Well, apparently my kids are zombies.
Posted by: padraig | October 30, 2017 at 05:59 PM
As long as it doesn't have any of that icky coconut, I'm up to try this!
Posted by: PirateBoy | October 30, 2017 at 06:35 PM
Halloween is a great teaching opportunity to your kids. I would impose a 65% tax on the candy they collect to teach them about the government.
Posted by: Qaz | October 30, 2017 at 07:39 PM
That reminds me to pick an extra vial of insulin
Posted by: Not Not My Usual Alias | October 30, 2017 at 09:20 PM
Candy is dandy, but liquor is quicker.
Nod to Clankie.
Posted by: ImNotDave | October 31, 2017 at 12:32 PM