Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
April 25, 2017
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I hate when that happens.
Does anyone have the link? Why? Just curious.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | April 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM
Unlike most people in this position (har!), she clearly has nothing to hide.
Posted by: Allen at Division | April 25, 2017 at 10:46 AM
tourism, voyeurism - its a thin line.
Posted by: Markhh | April 25, 2017 at 11:07 AM
The Parish will re-think the firing when the level of tourism bumps up.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | April 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM
Sounds like something I would do, but this is way worse than hitting "Reply to All" when you don't mean to.
Posted by: ubetcha | April 25, 2017 at 11:24 AM
Doesn't sound like there's going to be any tourism to direct going forward.
Posted by: Clankie | April 25, 2017 at 11:53 AM
She deserves another chance
Posted by: Anthony Weiner | April 25, 2017 at 12:12 PM
Sounds like a resume enhancer to get the Vegas tourism job.
Posted by: LeDud | April 25, 2017 at 12:14 PM
channeling ligirl
All we are say-ing is give piece-of-this a chance
Posted by: Anthony Weiner | April 25, 2017 at 12:48 PM
Sounds like a cover up.
Or should have been!
Posted by: PirateBoy | April 25, 2017 at 01:37 PM
Webster? Wasn't he that cute little kid on that TV show?
What?
Posted by: funny man | April 25, 2017 at 02:01 PM
Your 15 minutes of fame have expired. Or insert another gold coin....
Posted by: zamasama | April 25, 2017 at 02:28 PM
Not bad for 61, just sayin'.
Posted by: OldPhil | April 25, 2017 at 07:13 PM
I'm with Jeff on wanting to see that link before rushing to judgment. The lady simply may have been doing her job and working to increase tourism, but how can we know?
Posted by: Le Petomane | April 25, 2017 at 07:45 PM
Not bad for 61, just sayin'.
Well, as one who has had the occasion in the past of delving the less savory quarters of the interwebs (for research purposes, thank you), I strongly suspect she looks far better with her clothes on than off.
Posted by: Spiny Norman | April 26, 2017 at 12:48 AM