THEY FOUND 'A SMALL CORRELATION'
Average penis size revealed: Scientists attempt to find what is 'normal' to reassure concerned men
(Thanks to Le Petomane, Al Barkafski, Dave D and DaninDallas)
« Previous | Main | Next »
January 22, 2016
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-
If that's true, I'll rent them a magnifying glass.
Posted by: funny man | January 22, 2016 at 03:53 PM
Disclaimer: The figures for erect penis sizes include Elton John's 'teeny' member. Prior to the study, John's tiny Longshank was the only record kept by her Majesty regarding the size of her Royal Subject's Little Johns.
Thanks in advance.
Posted by: manual tomato | January 22, 2016 at 04:37 PM
Ahem. I am not concerned.
Posted by: Android© | January 22, 2016 at 04:50 PM
Little Willy won't go home.
Posted by: The Sweet | January 22, 2016 at 04:51 PM
"Stretched?" Stretched?"
Posted by: rrobr | January 22, 2016 at 04:52 PM
gcc
thcrc surc arc a L0t of short mcn out thcrc - darc i say 'tccnic wccnic' ?
Posted by: ligirl | January 22, 2016 at 05:03 PM
From the comments:
Can't get the mental image of a fluffer in a lab coat holding a clipboard out of my mind...
LMAO!
Posted by: Spiny Norman | January 22, 2016 at 05:32 PM
More proof that scientists are perverts.
Posted by: Clankie | January 22, 2016 at 05:42 PM
So many questions:
- Following @rrobr, "Stretched" ???
- Were the Members of Parliament measured?
- Were the subjects compensated?
- Isn't the writer's putting "standard procedure" in quotation marks a wee bit creepy?
- Do British urologists refer to the journal publishing the results as "The Bee Jay"?
Ah, science!
Posted by: Chuck | January 22, 2016 at 05:58 PM
ok so i guess i'm the only one who saw all the 'e's looking like 'c's in this article ?
- or was it my iis (@@) ?!
Posted by: ligirl | January 22, 2016 at 06:14 PM
'Scuse me while I whip this out.
One hates to ask but...did Prince Charles participate?
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | January 22, 2016 at 06:32 PM
What about a weight?
Posted by: Qaz | January 22, 2016 at 06:53 PM
What was the ambient temperature? Was there any shrinkage?
Posted by: Heywood | January 22, 2016 at 06:57 PM
No comment.
Posted by: Just Some Guy | January 22, 2016 at 07:07 PM
"More than a mouthful is wasted" F. Zappa
Posted by: ImNotDave | January 22, 2016 at 07:36 PM
File this under short subjects.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | January 22, 2016 at 07:36 PM
Well, average for Brits. We Americans, are, ahem, exceptional.
Posted by: John Baur | January 23, 2016 at 08:24 AM
Key comment:
Every comment on this site, with the exception of mine, is a post by a sick pervert.
Posted by: oneblankspace | January 23, 2016 at 09:42 AM
Sort of a Peter Principle, is it?
Posted by: JG | January 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM
Hold me closer, tiny dancer?
Posted by: PirateBoy the Proud | January 23, 2016 at 12:43 PM
Just remember guys: It's not the size of the boat nor the motion of the ocean, it's whether or not the captain can stay in port long enough for all the passengers to get off.
Think about it.
Posted by: nursecindy | January 23, 2016 at 01:21 PM