CASE DISMISSED
Vero Beach man with drugs in trousers says pants not his
(Thanks to Jeff Meyerson)
« Previous | Main | Next »
April 29, 2013
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-
So, I guess the penalty for theft is less than the penalty for possession of crack? Is that the logic?
Ha, silly me looking for logic in the claims of a criminal.
Posted by: JD | April 29, 2013 at 06:16 PM
What is that Polish saying, this ain't my circus and that ain't my monkey'?
Posted by: Annie in Texas | April 29, 2013 at 06:24 PM
Wasn't that O.J.'s defense?
Posted by: HogsAteMySister | April 29, 2013 at 06:35 PM
Never heard of a church where crack was needed. Mushrooms, ganga, wine, maybe. Busted.
Posted by: Loudmouth | April 30, 2013 at 06:48 AM
Were they on fire?
Posted by: Brian D. f/k/a Mahatma Kane | April 30, 2013 at 09:18 AM
"...the investigator spied a half smoked marijuana cigarette, which is a cigarette made of marijuana."
Thanks for the clarification!
Posted by: The Gweeper | April 30, 2013 at 01:19 PM