THE CANADIAN FORESKIN AWARENESS PROJECT TAKES ACTION
Oprah protested for endorsing face cream made from foreskins
(Thanks to Unholy Slacker)
« Previous | Main | Next »
January 24, 2013
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
mohel cream?
Posted by: ligirl | January 24, 2013 at 03:18 PM
sigh - one of those situations where you wish both sides could lose...
Posted by: Digger | January 24, 2013 at 03:36 PM
They're making a mountain out of a mohel
Posted by: Bill Hudgins | January 24, 2013 at 03:44 PM
That stuff will make you cockeyed
Posted by: poker | January 24, 2013 at 03:49 PM
Firm up that sagging puss.
Posted by: Loudmouth | January 24, 2013 at 03:55 PM
Thank goodness for stupid posters.
No foresight wanted here.
Posted by: Steve | January 24, 2013 at 03:57 PM
I guess the project isn't very effective because I'm not aware of the benefits of Canadian foreskin over any other brand.
Then again, I don't really want to be.
Posted by: JD | January 24, 2013 at 05:48 PM
Foreskin and seven beers ago....
Posted by: Ralph | January 24, 2013 at 07:05 PM
Well, they ARE soft, right? I'm surprised Michael Jackson didn't graft them onto his face.
Wait ...
Posted by: ubetcha | January 24, 2013 at 07:06 PM
Foreskin feels REALLY good. Seriously, it's the best part.
Posted by: Ron Low | January 25, 2013 at 12:23 AM
What about fiveskins?
Posted by: wiredog | January 25, 2013 at 07:00 AM
I saw the Canadian Foreskin Awareness Project open for the Alan Parsons Project.
Posted by: Dan Barr | January 25, 2013 at 10:35 AM
International doctors' organizations condemn the AAP's stance on circumcision. Since the anniversary of the AAP's statement is coming soon (the AAP's statement was made on August 27, 2012), it might be worth it to do a news story about the condemnation of the AAP's statement on infant male circumcision by 38 doctors representing various international medical associations. This is groundbreaking and historic. Why? When was the last time you have heard of so many doctors and their organizations condemning another doctors' organization? I am including a reference to the American Academy of Pediatrics own journal which presents the international condemnation of the AAP:
Cultural Bias in the AAP's 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on Male Circumcision
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2013/03/12/peds.2012-2896.full.pdf
http://knmg.artsennet.nl/Nieuws/Nieuwsarchief/Nieuwsbericht-1/International-physicians-protest-against-American-Academy-of-Pediatrics-policy-on-infant-male-circumcision.htm
Posted by: Sonny Vizzle | July 27, 2013 at 07:08 PM