Dave Barry's Blog: FASHION FOR "MEN"

January 28, 2013

FASHION FOR "MEN"

Honest.

(Thanks to Alkali Bill)

Posted by judi on January 28, 2013 at 01:58 PM | Permalink

Comments

You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

he looks miserable, wonder why?

Posted by: maryqos | January 28, 2013 at 02:14 PM

I'm sure I don't need to tell this multi-lingual and erudite group what "Comme des garçons" means. These don't look like any boys I know. They do look really emo, though.

Posted by: Omniskeptic | January 28, 2013 at 02:20 PM

The saddest part of that page is in the upper right corner: "1 of 48"

Posted by: padraig | January 28, 2013 at 02:23 PM

Oddly enough, the least objectionable thing was the ww1 german helmet with the bunny ears

Posted by: Hammond Rye | January 28, 2013 at 02:51 PM

I can totally see Brad Pitt wearing this stuff.

Posted by: HogsAteMySister | January 28, 2013 at 03:10 PM

"he looks miserable, wonder why?"

It's because he's thinking: " I guess I my dream of becoming an astronaut is over..."

Posted by: Alkali Bill | January 28, 2013 at 03:57 PM

Dressed to surrender.

Posted by: mazar larry | January 28, 2013 at 03:59 PM

The Boy Scouts are discussing considering changing the uniforms.

Posted by: mazar larry | January 28, 2013 at 04:10 PM

mazar, the Scouts did say today that they'd consider letting gay folks join up. Coincidence?

Posted by: padraig | January 28, 2013 at 04:58 PM

Is that a fake mullet? Tell me it is not a fake mullet under his weird Mickey Mouse-like ears.

Posted by: Elon | January 28, 2013 at 05:02 PM

Well, I think you blog guys would look fabulous in some of those outfits. Post pictures.

Posted by: nursecindy | January 28, 2013 at 06:29 PM

There dads must be so proud.

Posted by: JD | January 28, 2013 at 07:13 PM

There's a whole stretch of stuff in that slideshow (I clicked all the way through, because I'm bored) that looks like it might have been stolen from Paula Poundstone's closet.

Posted by: Captain Spoilsport | January 28, 2013 at 08:04 PM

Garçons means dweeb now...?

Posted by: Clankie | January 28, 2013 at 08:13 PM

Yes, bloglits, haute couteur fashion designers hate les garçons as much as they hate les femmes.

Posted by: Spiny Norman | January 28, 2013 at 09:34 PM

Shouldn't that be "las femmes"?

Posted by: Toto | January 28, 2013 at 09:54 PM

Those are the homeliest women I have ever seen.

Posted by: Anon and Anon | January 28, 2013 at 10:52 PM

These guys all look like they are coming down after a 3 day bender on heroin after being forced to listen to David Bowie music, or perhaps engaging in a bit of the old ultra-violence down at the local milk-bar?

Posted by: PirateBoy | January 28, 2013 at 11:05 PM

Are you sure those are men's clothes? Those models look like girls to me ... I mean despite the whole "commes des garcon" thing.

Posted by: RobinGoodfellow | January 28, 2013 at 11:26 PM

They look like homeless women. I have never understood "high" fashion. But at least they dress the men as bizarrely as they dress the women.

Posted by: Sheherazahde | January 29, 2013 at 03:05 AM

Death before dishonor.

Posted by: Cheesewiz | January 29, 2013 at 08:25 AM

Les Miserables?

Posted by: MikeyVA | January 29, 2013 at 09:15 AM

NYT said I could not look at any more of their crap with out paying 99 cents. I am devastated, it's not worth that much to me.

Posted by: Ken_in_SC (@Ken_in_SC) | January 29, 2013 at 03:01 PM

Ken -There is a way to cheat the system.