Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
October 29, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Hate when my groinal region gets mixed up with somebody else's. Well, not always.
Posted by: Dmentd | October 29, 2012 at 11:10 AM
Les Schwab ? Snooty French tire store?
Posted by: markhh | October 29, 2012 at 11:38 AM
Too many lawyers. Back in the day, if you were even in the same room as a groin, it was considered 'constructive possession'
Posted by: Betsy | October 29, 2012 at 11:44 AM
Couldn't he be charged with theft of someone else's groin?
Posted by: Not My Usual Alias | October 29, 2012 at 11:46 AM
Well these guys seem to stick everything else in their pants during shoplifting....why not an extra groin.
Posted by: LeDud | October 29, 2012 at 12:21 PM
If he's wandering the streets with someone's groin other than his own in his britches, getting arrested in possession of meth is the least of his worries.
Posted by: Jan in Grimsby | October 29, 2012 at 12:38 PM
I swear to God, Officer! That's not my mouth that said that patently absurd and fallacious thing!
Posted by: Omniskeptic | October 29, 2012 at 05:23 PM
Perhaps it was really actor Jerry O'Connell, in his
researching role as Herman Franken**** Munster?
I know, bad joke, bad show....
Posted by: funny man | October 30, 2012 at 12:45 PM