THEY CAN GET OUT OF HAND
Woman requests legal injuction for a penis
(Thanks to Matt Filar)
« Previous | Main | Next »
October 30, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-
If this person, and I say that not knowing what gender we are talking about here had lost said penis in some kind of accident then by all means try to replace it. Since the separation of body and penis was voluntary you don't get another. Should have taken care of the first one.
Posted by: wingnut | October 30, 2012 at 08:57 PM
Well, it IS a woamn's prerogative to change his mind...
Posted by: SW | October 30, 2012 at 09:09 PM
Wingnut is exactly right--when voluntary surgery is involved, no do-overs!
Posted by: Allen at Division | October 31, 2012 at 08:38 AM
I would love to see a cross-faith panel discussion on this one. Or maybe a presidential debate. Or a reality show.
Coming up on "Religion's Got Lunatics" ...
Posted by: Omniskeptic | October 31, 2012 at 09:45 AM
Someone needs to make up their mind.
Posted by: Jan in Grimsby | October 31, 2012 at 09:54 AM
Oh, come on.
"No do-overs" would in some ways eliminate politicians.
Wait.
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2012 at 09:56 AM
Mrs. Garrison?
Posted by: ubetcha | October 31, 2012 at 11:28 AM
I love how they fuzzed out her sunglasses so they couldn't be used to identify her. Him. Whatever.
Posted by: padraig | October 31, 2012 at 12:31 PM
Attach it with velcro so when she/he/it changes her/his/its mind it will be easy to do.
Posted by: EyeGore | October 31, 2012 at 12:32 PM
Can't they find a living donor in a penile institution?
Posted by: Ralph | October 31, 2012 at 04:44 PM