Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
June 28, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
i keep telling you, the only way we're going to get the kids to pull their pants up is if all of us middle aged guys start wearing our pants down below our buttocks. when we endorse this style as 'cool' it will immediately become fashion anathema to the yutes of the world.
Posted by: balzac | June 28, 2012 at 12:34 PM
line will form to the right...
Posted by: queensbee | June 28, 2012 at 12:42 PM
balzac, you are correct, eventually even the "uncool" kids will wear them and the pants on the ground will go the way of MC Hammer pants, Bell bottoms, dickeys (geezer alert) and (sigh) daisy dukes. You can probably still see all of these, plus a mullet or two, at your local Walmart.
Posted by: WVplantman | June 28, 2012 at 12:56 PM
Now they don't have a picture of Earlene or state her age, but I would bet there is not a woman alive under the age of 75 named "Earlene." All the little Britneys and Briannas done pushed out all the Earlenes.
Posted by: padraig | June 28, 2012 at 02:47 PM
Lady Godiva rode naked thru the town to save the townspeople from the taxman I think. This modern day version will do the same so teenage boys can walk around holding their pants up and showing off their briefs. Hmmmmmm. Question: Why don't teenage girls walk around with their pants half down showing off their underwear ? Seems like it would be a much more noticed fashion statement.
Posted by: LeDud | June 28, 2012 at 04:34 PM
May an old geezer ask a question? OK, two, counting this one.
Do these droopy drawers expose the wearers' skimpies or the crack in his foundation?
If just underwear is showing, I propose that to be consistent, they'd have to dynamite a whole department down at the JC Penney's.
And why is a young lady indecent when wearing a bra and panties but ogled when she wears a bathing suit that may show more?
And...what? Time for my pills?
Posted by: Steve | June 28, 2012 at 04:41 PM
Monroe is a community in NJ, made up of retirement homes. It is not gonna be a pretty site. And she is AGAINST the baggy pant, LeDud. She is protesting that the law mandating pants must fit failed city council.
Posted by: Elon | June 28, 2012 at 04:42 PM
How many blog guys are planning on attending the next Monroe City Council meeting? I don't understand why young boys wear their pants this way. Personally, I think a man in suspenders is sexy.
Posted by: nursecindy | June 28, 2012 at 05:08 PM
If she likes to show her plumber's crack, most likely she looks like a plumber. Pass.
Posted by: Loudmouth | June 28, 2012 at 08:53 PM