THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SECRET SERVICE
Why ‘the sex life of the screwworm’ deserves taxpayer dollars
(Thanks to jon harris)
« Previous | Main | Next »
Why ‘the sex life of the screwworm’ deserves taxpayer dollars
(Thanks to jon harris)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I admit that I didn't read every word of the article, but that is not a picture of a screw worm. I know a squirrel when I see one.
Posted by: Omniskeptic | April 27, 2012 at 09:14 AM
“We create what every previous generation would have described as magic,” he concludes.
In WHAT universe?
Posted by: funny man | April 27, 2012 at 10:02 AM
Next: Congress claims Harry Potter was a secret weapon that UK stole. They however want more studies before the next budget hearings.
Posted by: funny man | April 27, 2012 at 10:04 AM
I always thought "Screw-worm" was a code name for
what a guinea pig does when you...
Posted by: Lance Bottoms | April 27, 2012 at 10:08 AM
THIS is what happens when you mix a squirrel and screw-worms DNA....
and if that doesn't scare you, Nothing will!
Posted by: funny man | April 27, 2012 at 10:50 AM
I dunno FM, seems kinda beige to me.
Posted by: wiredog | April 27, 2012 at 12:03 PM
"It helped researchers control the population of a deadly parasite that targets cattle--costing the government $250,000 but ultimately saving the cattle industry more than $20 billion, according to Cooper’s office."
Um, then shouldn't the cattle industry have paid for it?
OK.....back to humor.
Posted by: Coconuts | April 27, 2012 at 12:08 PM
Maybe that statement should have read "It helped researchers control the population of a deadly parasite that targets cattle--costing taxpayers $250,000, but ultimately saving US consumers more than $20 billion by reducing the cattle industry's costs...".
Posted by: DrPat | April 27, 2012 at 01:00 PM
Yet one more example of "excellence in journalism" can be found here ... very reassuring that the media is so well-versed in reality ...
" ... has created the first annual ..." ...
Nope. Not possible. Even the AP Stylebook, which this "reporter" has apparently failed to read, will tell us this fact ... (Can NOT be "annual" when a year has not yet elapsed ... "First ever" -- OK ... "Second Annual" -- OK ... )
Posted by: O the Umanity | April 27, 2012 at 01:15 PM
It has a big stick.
Posted by: Loudmouth | April 27, 2012 at 04:50 PM