« Previous | Main | Next »
February 18, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
So, smaller portions and higher prices. Halloween candy all year 'round.
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | February 18, 2012 at 09:33 AM
The food Nazis strike again.
Posted by: MikeyVA | February 18, 2012 at 09:33 AM
Exactly right, Horace. As usual the consumer gets the shaft.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | February 18, 2012 at 09:39 AM
The National Association of Conglomerated Pharmacies has also announced that henceforth all candy bars will be behind the counter, next to the Sudafed.
Posted by: Just Some Guy | February 18, 2012 at 09:46 AM
Q. HOW MANY CALORIES ARE THERE IN A PIECE OF CHOCOLATE?
A. WHO CARES?
Posted by: ligirl | February 18, 2012 at 10:16 AM
Amazing. I wonder when they will get rid of the super sized drinks and fries ect.. in fast foods.
Posted by: Theresa | February 18, 2012 at 10:18 AM
Good point Theresa and I agree with ligirl. Actually I think this is a great idea, if you live in hell. Leave my candy bars alone!
Posted by: nursecindy | February 18, 2012 at 10:28 AM
You can have my Almond Joy and Three Musketeers when you rip them from my cold, dead hand.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | February 18, 2012 at 10:29 AM
So you buy Hershey's, Cadbury and Nestle. At least until they figure out they can make more PR points, food Nazi points and profit by shrinking everything, too.
Posted by: Loudmouth | February 18, 2012 at 10:33 AM
As long as they don't mess with my Kit Kat bars, I'll be okay.
Posted by: nursecindy | February 18, 2012 at 10:41 AM
Another ploy by "Marketing" (and "Image" has a hand in it, too, I'm sure) to lower the size, thereby raising (not "raisin") the price ...
Now we'll hafta buy TWO (or 16? Does the bag of mini-bars count as "one" or "several"?) in order to get our caloric intake requirement ... and "two" is never as cheap as "one that's bigger" ...
Now that I think of it ... it'll be easier to buy the mini-bar bag ... that way a person could snack all day long -- well, until noonish, ennyway -- and it would prolly be less costly than the six-pack of the "regular ... but SMALLER" bars ...
Posted by: O the Umanity | February 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM
Snork @ UtheO!
Jeff, you were supposed to say "you can have my King Size caloric Snickers bar when you pry it from my cold, dead stomach!" Or so I'd have thought...
Posted by: funny man | February 18, 2012 at 11:36 AM
Technical issue: Judy or Dave: Is TypePad working correctly? It cut off part of my comment even though I had it (a quote) properly using hypertexts instructs
and proper closure. Or is it becoming sentinet or a
comedian?
Just asking...never seen it do that before..???
Posted by: funny man | February 18, 2012 at 11:39 AM
What a bunch of Goobers.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | February 18, 2012 at 11:50 AM
The Lindt chocolate factory is just down the road from me. Can you say VATS OF CHOCOLATE?! And can you say MENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH BATTERING RAMS????
I knew that you could.
Posted by: Punkin | February 18, 2012 at 12:03 PM
Why Punkin ... whyever would proximity to chocolate be important to
oldmenopausal women (I live with one, or, more exactly, she allows me to stay in the same domiciliacal structure as whut she's occupyin' @ any given moment -- that's MB(RH?) ... RH? -- and we never ... well, mostly never ... well, less than 10 percent of the time ... have such a compensationary need ...) hafta have a factory outlet near to hand?Posted by: O the Umanity | February 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM
*SMACKS O the U, grabs battering ram and goes with Punkin to storm Lindt factory*
Posted by: nursecindy | February 18, 2012 at 12:38 PM
Does anyone remember the Chunky bar ? I'll bet the spoil sports killed that one too.
Posted by: Clankie | February 18, 2012 at 12:53 PM
The $100,000 chocolate bar just doesn't go as fare as it used to....
Seriously, "-calories"?
Posted by: oneblankspace | February 18, 2012 at 01:30 PM
or as far
Posted by: oneblankspace | February 18, 2012 at 01:31 PM
I prolly deserved that ... but they din't find the two bags of chocolate chips I had hidden in my jacket pocket ...
"Is that a bag of chocolate in yer pocket? HAND IT OVER!"
Posted by: O the Umanity | February 18, 2012 at 01:54 PM
Why can't you just eat two?
Or would that give the food Nazis the idea of rationing?
Posted by: Steve | February 18, 2012 at 03:41 PM
I was just in the Dollar Store this afternoon. A standard Crunch bar is 220 calories.
Posted by: Loudmouth | February 18, 2012 at 04:58 PM
Clankie, I *love* Chunky bars. They still make them.
Posted by: Guin | February 18, 2012 at 06:27 PM
I love Chunky bars too. In fact I don't think I've ever met a candy bar that I didn't like.
Posted by: nursecindy | February 18, 2012 at 06:32 PM
weirdly enough, Mars also owns Uncle Ben's Rice
Posted by: Bill Hudgins | February 18, 2012 at 07:16 PM
I wouldn't go that far, cindy - there are a few chocolate bars I can pass by - but add me to the Chunky Support Group.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | February 18, 2012 at 07:16 PM
I get my Chunky at Walgreen's.
But I'm not opposed to the idea of storming the Lindt factory, either.
Posted by: gjd | February 18, 2012 at 07:59 PM
I think I'll go invent chocolate covered rice. I wouldn't eat it, just invent it.
"Whata chunka chocolate!"
Posted by: Wolfsong | February 18, 2012 at 09:41 PM
I remember the commercials..."Open wide for Chunky!" ISIANMTU.
Posted by: Dmentd | February 18, 2012 at 10:32 PM
NC and Punkin!
I'll bring my Glock.
Posted by: MikeyVA | February 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM