WHAT, EXACTLY, DO WE HAVE AGAINST LOW-FLOW TOILETS?
This:
(Thanks to Kathryn)
(Sorry about the bad link before)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
January 27, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
So low flow toilets make me log into an unknown website? I don't get it??????
Posted by: oldfatguy | January 27, 2012 at 12:14 PM
OFG, pretty much. Low flow toilet, googly mail link: neither one properly delivers the content.
Posted by: Carl-Bear | January 27, 2012 at 12:20 PM
Surprisingly, we all can't view Dave's email.
Posted by: Aarif | January 27, 2012 at 12:20 PM
Is that why we go to the bathroom? To avoid stoppage?
Oh, you mean the plumming....
Posted by: funny man | January 27, 2012 at 12:31 PM
I happen to own a 7-gallon Hi-Flow toilet ... well, two of 'em, actually ...
Dave knows this, he read my t-shirt ...
Or did I mention this already?
(Merely helpin' Dave as he preaches to the choir ...)
Posted by: O the Umanity | January 27, 2012 at 12:44 PM
There are companies that have dual flush toilets -- up for #1, down for #2. I tried to send it in to McClatchyMail powered by GoOgle, but neither the Blog nor judi picked up (!) on it.
http://www.sloanvalve.com/Our_Products/UPPERCUT.aspx
Posted by: oneblankspace | January 27, 2012 at 01:06 PM
Which is worse? A low-flow toilet, or a warning sign written entirely in Comic Sans?
Posted by: Chris S. | January 27, 2012 at 01:11 PM
Now lemme get this straight... We use low flow toilets to conserve water, but they don't...uh...scavenge well, so we have to flush them a lot more often.
And I seem to remember OtU's 7 Gallon Gargler from several years back.
Posted by: pogo | January 27, 2012 at 01:15 PM
They also need a sign that says "Don't hover and pee all over the seat. If you do, clean it up."
Posted by: nursecindy | January 27, 2012 at 02:16 PM
...buncha low down four-flushers...
Posted by: padraig | January 27, 2012 at 02:44 PM
Correctamundo, pogo ... I even have a t-shirt that professes my claim to Fame & Glory (not "glory hole") ...
Posted by: O the Umanity | January 27, 2012 at 03:29 PM
" WHAT, EXACTLY, DO WE HAVE AGAINST LOW-FLOW TOILETS? "
(1) Much less effective for scalding siblings in the shower.
Posted by: Clankie | January 27, 2012 at 05:47 PM
Doncha hate it when you flush and your spouse has to tell you that the SS Titanic put off a few lifeboats before it went down?
Posted by: Steve | January 27, 2012 at 08:52 PM
You know what's almost as bad as low-flush toilets? Signs written in Comic Sans.
Posted by: Stev0 | January 27, 2012 at 11:42 PM
Lets see...low flows were "ideally" designed to save water.
However, my low flow frequently requires 2 or 3 flushes...so HOW is this saving water or money?
Never trust Congress when they make laws to "fix" what does not need "fixing"...
Posted by: funny man | January 29, 2012 at 12:12 PM