« Previous | Main | Next »
January 27, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-« Previous | Main | Next »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
So low flow toilets make me log into an unknown website? I don't get it??????
Posted by: oldfatguy | January 27, 2012 at 12:14 PM
OFG, pretty much. Low flow toilet, googly mail link: neither one properly delivers the content.
Posted by: Carl-Bear | January 27, 2012 at 12:20 PM
Surprisingly, we all can't view Dave's email.
Posted by: Aarif | January 27, 2012 at 12:20 PM
Is that why we go to the bathroom? To avoid stoppage?
Oh, you mean the plumming....
Posted by: funny man | January 27, 2012 at 12:31 PM
I happen to own a 7-gallon Hi-Flow toilet ... well, two of 'em, actually ...
Dave knows this, he read my t-shirt ...
Or did I mention this already?
(Merely helpin' Dave as he preaches to the choir ...)
Posted by: O the Umanity | January 27, 2012 at 12:44 PM
There are companies that have dual flush toilets -- up for #1, down for #2. I tried to send it in to McClatchyMail powered by GoOgle, but neither the Blog nor judi picked up (!) on it.
http://www.sloanvalve.com/Our_Products/UPPERCUT.aspx
Posted by: oneblankspace | January 27, 2012 at 01:06 PM
Which is worse? A low-flow toilet, or a warning sign written entirely in Comic Sans?
Posted by: Chris S. | January 27, 2012 at 01:11 PM
Now lemme get this straight... We use low flow toilets to conserve water, but they don't...uh...scavenge well, so we have to flush them a lot more often.
And I seem to remember OtU's 7 Gallon Gargler from several years back.
Posted by: pogo | January 27, 2012 at 01:15 PM
They also need a sign that says "Don't hover and pee all over the seat. If you do, clean it up."
Posted by: nursecindy | January 27, 2012 at 02:16 PM
...buncha low down four-flushers...
Posted by: padraig | January 27, 2012 at 02:44 PM
Correctamundo, pogo ... I even have a t-shirt that professes my claim to Fame & Glory (not "glory hole") ...
Posted by: O the Umanity | January 27, 2012 at 03:29 PM
" WHAT, EXACTLY, DO WE HAVE AGAINST LOW-FLOW TOILETS? "
(1) Much less effective for scalding siblings in the shower.
Posted by: Clankie | January 27, 2012 at 05:47 PM
Doncha hate it when you flush and your spouse has to tell you that the SS Titanic put off a few lifeboats before it went down?
Posted by: Steve | January 27, 2012 at 08:52 PM
You know what's almost as bad as low-flush toilets? Signs written in Comic Sans.
Posted by: Stev0 | January 27, 2012 at 11:42 PM
Lets see...low flows were "ideally" designed to save water.
However, my low flow frequently requires 2 or 3 flushes...so HOW is this saving water or money?
Never trust Congress when they make laws to "fix" what does not need "fixing"...
Posted by: funny man | January 29, 2012 at 12:12 PM