THE RELENTLESS ASSAULT ON OUR PRECIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS CONTINUES
Man arrested in Glendale for allegedly driving without pants
(Thanks to Jay Brandes and manual tomato)
« Previous | Main | Next »
January 30, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-
Bad link.....
Posted by: P Cros. | January 30, 2012 at 02:52 PM
Bad, Bad, Naughty Link!
Posted by: jon | January 30, 2012 at 02:57 PM
B-DOUBLE-E-DOUBLE-R-U-N
-- George Jones
Posted by: O the Umanity | January 30, 2012 at 02:57 PM
Try this link. Fortunately there are no pictures.
Posted by: nursecindy | January 30, 2012 at 03:39 PM
Point of clarification, does it count if you have pants but they are around your ankles?
Posted by: wingnut | January 30, 2012 at 03:53 PM
must've been trying to make a 'deposit'
Posted by: ligirl | January 30, 2012 at 04:16 PM
I dunno, wing' ...
are y'all... um ... is the person wearin' socks?Posted by: O the Umanity | January 30, 2012 at 04:17 PM
Umar Khan...The Sheik of Araby (With no pants on).
Posted by: Ernie G | January 30, 2012 at 04:26 PM
*didn't know we were 'spose to 'pant' while driving*
Posted by: ligirl | January 30, 2012 at 04:46 PM
If anyone tries to see whether or not another driver is wearing pants, they have a more serious problem than the pants-less driver and should probably be arrested.
Posted by: max | January 30, 2012 at 05:07 PM
Yeah, that's in like the 37th amendment or something, right? The right to not keep and bear pants?
Posted by: Omniskeptic | January 31, 2012 at 10:11 AM