STAY KLASSY, KARDASHIANS
(Thanks to Jeff Meyerson)
« Previous | Main | Next »
January 31, 2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Dave's up early this morning. You covering the election?
Posted by: wiredog | January 31, 2012 at 06:59 AM
You mean "stay Klassy" don't you Dave?
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | January 31, 2012 at 07:00 AM
Oops - I retract that. Too early to see Dave is already on top of the boobs, so to speak.
Haven't had my wake up coffee yet.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | January 31, 2012 at 07:06 AM
Anyway, the girls fit right in with the previous "boob" entry.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | January 31, 2012 at 07:07 AM
i'm sure it's been noted that the jeans are tighter than bruce jenner's face
Posted by: ligirl | January 31, 2012 at 07:16 AM
Is that even possible?
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | January 31, 2012 at 07:58 AM
Silicone not included.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | January 31, 2012 at 08:04 AM
Kim has clearly become the Dolly Parton of her generation. She might think about letting just a little bit out of those things before they burst. On the other hand, in case of a water landing I'm betting they could be used as a flotation device.
Posted by: wingnut | January 31, 2012 at 08:52 AM
... yeah, wing' ... a flotation device fer an Abrams tank ...
(Nah ... not really ... it's the best I could think of this early in the a.m. ... goin' back fer more coffee ... )
Posted by: O the Umanity | January 31, 2012 at 09:26 AM
OK ... got my heart started with 2nd cuppa coffee ...
UM ... to use the vernacular of another age ...
Advertisin' that uses endorsers such as these, who are objectionable (to Moi Ownself) in their behavior patterns cause me to think I'd rather be nibbled to death by a Muscovy duck, than shop @ Sears ... (or Kame-Apart, where they have a convicted felon as an icon) ...
Of course S/K din't have a major share of my disposable income in the first place, so why would they care about my perception of their image? (Rhetoricalness again ... sorry it's not amusin' ...)
Posted by: O the Umanity | January 31, 2012 at 10:15 AM
Ok - another acronym: WGARA? Meaning, "Who Gives A Rat's A$$?"
You know, when I first heard about Kardashians, I thought it had something to do with Star Trek. Seriously.
Posted by: Omniskeptic | January 31, 2012 at 10:26 AM
Not clicking. Cindy warned me about Jeff's link.
Posted by: Elon | January 31, 2012 at 01:42 PM
Didja hear about the guy whose wife sent him to Cox's to buy a seersucker suit? He went to Sears instead.
Posted by: Ralph | January 31, 2012 at 02:17 PM
Yes I did Elon. I'm still trying to get the images out of my head.
Posted by: nursecindy | January 31, 2012 at 03:37 PM
In typical Kardashian lack-of-style, I can't help but notice their pants are already half off.....
Or, as Kardashian's mother asked one of them: "Did you hoard all this money by yourself?" To which she replied "No, each of my sisters whored a third of it."
Posted by: PirateBoy | January 31, 2012 at 09:20 PM
Good one PirateBoy.
Posted by: nursecindy | January 31, 2012 at 10:37 PM
Once a year I get lucky, NC ;)
Posted by: PirateBoy | February 01, 2012 at 12:06 AM
Wish I'd get lucky that often, P'B' ...
Posted by: O the Umanity | February 01, 2012 at 12:24 AM
yes, pirateboy
butt
they all whored the media
Posted by: ligirl | February 01, 2012 at 07:16 AM