THIS EXPLAINS A GREAT DEAL
Prince Charles says he’s related to original vampire
(Thanks to The Perts)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
October 29, 2011
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
But does he relate to this?
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | October 29, 2011 at 12:17 PM
I knew he had bats in his belfry.
Posted by: MikeyVA | October 29, 2011 at 01:14 PM
I don't know about that. Charlie is sort of bloodless.
Posted by: Loudmouth | October 29, 2011 at 02:20 PM
And he'll bite you in the neck with his ears to prove it.
Posted by: Clankie | October 29, 2011 at 02:21 PM
Why is the prince so eager to be linked to one of history’s bloodiest figures?
Because he’s a nut?
Posted by: nursecindy | October 29, 2011 at 03:06 PM
Aren't vampires supposed to be attractive and charismatic?
Posted by: padraig | October 29, 2011 at 03:14 PM
Where's Buffy?
Posted by: Ralph | October 29, 2011 at 03:27 PM
Most men have very recent unsavory ancestry.
I don't know anyone who hasn't, sometime or another, been called a "Son of a B!tch".
Posted by: Steve | October 30, 2011 at 11:24 AM