YOU THINK?
THERE was at least one downside to Farinelli's castration.
(Thanks to jon harris)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
July 25, 2011
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Limbs long enough for easy self-massage, but an ugly brain mass leaving him to wonder just why when he reached down there to perform the act, he felt only a breeze.
Posted by: eil | July 25, 2011 at 04:52 PM
nope
no walnuts there
Posted by: sandy | July 25, 2011 at 05:49 PM
Nothing like "solving" the problems of an 18th century deceased castrati, because, like well, we have solved all our other problems.
What is, by the way, a "superstar" headache?
Is it like on the cartoons when Wyle E. Coyote's head explodes?
Posted by: funny man | July 25, 2011 at 05:49 PM
Where are the Neuticles when you need them?
Posted by: Steve | July 25, 2011 at 06:06 PM
"at least one"?
I'd figure two, but maybe he had an undescended countertenor
Posted by: Betsy | July 25, 2011 at 06:46 PM
So castration gives you headaches.
Maybe that explains Michelle Bachman.
Posted by: Ross | July 26, 2011 at 03:36 AM