WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG?
Reverse angle parking unveiled
(Thanks to Carroll Stewart)
« Previous | Main | Next »
Reverse angle parking unveiled
(Thanks to Carroll Stewart)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
It only works if you hold your mouth a certain way and say certain words that would get your mouth washed out with soap.
Or own a Mercedes.
Posted by: MikeyVA | July 19, 2011 at 09:26 AM
Actually, I saw this for the first time yesterday in Elk Rapids, MI. It makes more sense than parallel parking, and I am pretty good at that. Mr. Coconuts, not so much...
Posted by: Coconuts | July 19, 2011 at 09:38 AM
Reverse Angle Parking? I saw them open for (wait for it) Traffic.
*ducks*
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | July 19, 2011 at 09:42 AM
My home town just on the right side of the Wisconsin/Illinois border is still an angle-parking holdout. In the summer (with 20,000 FIB's in town, each driving an Escalade) angle spots on the main drag are at a premium, to say the least. The Illinois drivers invented a move where you see a spot on the opposite side of the street and do a 135-degree semi-U-turn across traffic to grab it. We always called it the "flatlander turn."
We silly locals, of course, would take one of the free side street spots and plod nearly half a block to the main drag.
Posted by: padraig | July 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM
should improve traffic safety once drivers become acclimated
In the meantime, I'm with padraig. And those side streets even have trees...
Posted by: Betsy | July 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM
REVERSE PARKING TESTS could become part of the Drivers
License Renewal tests if this "idea" spreads like wildfire!
I reverse park in my own garage as it saves time. I only hit the garage
doorsidesframe a few times.Posted by: funny man | July 19, 2011 at 11:37 AM
Funny took some of mine.
Problem #4 scraping your Hummer down the side of the puny cars on either side.
Posted by: Loudmouth | July 19, 2011 at 11:47 AM
Actually this would be a good idea if it was not for the assumption that most driver's have brains. those that do lock them in the trunk before getting behind the wheel.
Posted by: oldfatguy | July 19, 2011 at 12:55 PM
A friend of mine just bought a new car that has a camera. The camera image appears in your rear view mirror when you are backing up. She's already knocked down a mailbox and run over both of her trash cans which her husband stupidly left at the curb for the garbage men. I'll tell her Wisconsin is closed, padraig.
Posted by: nursecindy | July 19, 2011 at 01:02 PM
Insurance guys are just going to love this.
Posted by: Wingnut | July 19, 2011 at 01:27 PM
Mr. Woody is NOT backing up to ME! But his idea isn't too bad for those of us with skills.
Posted by: eil | July 19, 2011 at 01:39 PM
First thing they have to learn, is how to use a turn signal!
Posted by: Wizkid54 | July 19, 2011 at 01:42 PM
Key quote from the
flame warcomments:I did go to a public school and I will say your right on this one.. My mistake.. Bet you could never admit it when your wrong..
your or you're ?
In other parts of Missouri, they have freeway interchanges where traffic on the secondary road drives on the left over the highway.
Posted by: oneblankspace | July 19, 2011 at 02:41 PM
Nursecindy, Mr. Telecom got a new car with the handy camera on the rear view mirror. He was parallel parking once, and wanted to see how far he was from the curb - so he *adjusted* the rear view mirror, trying to get the right angle. Meanwhile, I am laughing so hard, I can't even speak. Finally, I had to tell him the camera was in the back of the car and not on his mirror !! LOL LOL LOL !!!
Posted by: telecomdropout | July 19, 2011 at 03:14 PM
*aims the low spark of my high-heeled shoe at Jeff*
Posted by: Suzy Q (the original) | July 19, 2011 at 03:44 PM
so this 'rear-entry' method, even tho it may be a tight squeeze, ultimately facilitates an easier pull-out?
Posted by: sandy | July 19, 2011 at 04:14 PM
^...NTTAWWT...
Posted by: sandy | July 19, 2011 at 04:24 PM
We have another method of parallel parking in New hampshire.
Posted by: Ralph | July 19, 2011 at 04:59 PM
Good one Telecom! I would probably do the same thing.
Posted by: nursecindy | July 19, 2011 at 05:02 PM
Another bad idea.
Posted by: Cheesewiz | July 19, 2011 at 05:04 PM
We're doomed. Every accident my wife ever had, she backed into something.
It's a family thing. They all back into whatever is available.
Posted by: Steve | July 19, 2011 at 06:14 PM
This will probably work as I've seen so many attempts at parallel parking in which the car ends up diagonal anyway.
Posted by: Big Otis | July 19, 2011 at 07:18 PM