DISCUSS AMONG YOURSELVES
'Females are failed males,' says 16th century guide book on women
(Thanks to Anil Haji)
« Previous | Main | Next »
'Females are failed males,' says 16th century guide book on women
(Thanks to Anil Haji)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
whattcha lookin at here? keep moving.
Posted by: queensbee | April 27, 2011 at 11:19 AM
Yeah? And romantic comedies are failed action flicks.
Posted by: Loudmouth | April 27, 2011 at 11:30 AM
So even back then no one understood those creatures. They always scare me.
Posted by: oldfatguy | April 27, 2011 at 12:08 PM
Failed males?! You come back here, Dave Barry, and discuss this with us "failed males". I notice the blog guys are being unusually quiet on this subject.
Posted by: nursecindy | April 27, 2011 at 12:17 PM
Albertus Magnus? Maybe Big Al had jug ears and a gap-toothed grin and this was this the 16th-century Mad magazine.
Posted by: Surrounded by em | April 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM
Now is when we girls need to board our way back machine and give a good twacking to Albertus.
Posted by: Mikey | April 27, 2011 at 12:41 PM
Wanna sniff my lettuce?
Posted by: BAB | April 27, 2011 at 12:54 PM
The important news is the "related item" to the left ...
Chubby fashion models 'will make women fat'
Posted by: markhh | April 27, 2011 at 01:17 PM
A book that old would be out of copyright, so watch for it on GoOgle books.
Posted by: oneblankspace | April 27, 2011 at 02:06 PM
I may be failed, but you can't blame me for cheating.
Posted by: Loudmouth | April 27, 2011 at 02:29 PM
This is from "A Physician's Counsels To Man In Health And Disease." By Walter C. Taylor A.M., M.D. published in 1872. His views on contraception.
These practices favor libertinism. A man who would fear to seduce an unmarried woman lest a child should be born, is induced, by knowledge of this kind, to persuade her to her ruin. It is an inducement to dissipation, and hence a danger to society.
The tastes and habits of sensuality are thus fostered. Wives, for their own sake, ought not to countenance them. The holy rites of the marriage couch ought not to be made solely the satisfaction of sexual instincts, and marriage thus defrauded of one of its noblest aims. The wife is not so much respected, who thus comes to be regarded merely as a companion with whom to lead a lascivious life. She is in danger of sinking to the level of a mistress. Her moral prestige, that halo of modesty which forms her greatest charm, is imperiled. Any fate is preferable to this. Better suffer by the minor annoyance of numerous children than forfeit her domestic happiness.
Posted by: frederic1943 | April 27, 2011 at 03:35 PM
I've sniffed a few lettuces in my time.
Also, Sniffed Lettuces WBAGNFA '60s folk band.
Posted by: Suzy Q (the original) | April 27, 2011 at 03:45 PM
*reaches up and adjusts my halo of modesty*
Posted by: nursecindy | April 27, 2011 at 03:46 PM
A good woman is just a woman, but a good cigar is a smoke.
Posted by: Rudyard Kipling | April 27, 2011 at 06:33 PM
"women being able to kill animals with a glance during their time of the month"
I will be brave enough to state that I don't find this hard to believe.
Posted by: Wolfsong | April 28, 2011 at 12:23 AM