IMAGINE THE GOOD THAT A LARGE ONE WOULD DO
A Small Nuclear War Would Stall Global Warming
(Thanks to jon harris)
« Previous | Main | Next »
A Small Nuclear War Would Stall Global Warming
(Thanks to jon harris)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
So, 100 is too many. Would 15 or 20 be OK?
I wonder how many above ground tests have been done and what impact they have had on today's environment.
Posted by: Not My Usual Alias | February 28, 2011 at 02:44 PM
But what would it do to Al Gore?
Posted by: Dorakay | February 28, 2011 at 03:01 PM
Rad, man.
Posted by: bonmot | February 28, 2011 at 03:32 PM
This is global nuclear winter from Time Magazine about 1972. Glad they're keeping up.
Posted by: Loudmouth | February 28, 2011 at 05:03 PM
Everything old is new again.
Posted by: Guin | February 28, 2011 at 07:37 PM
All that H-Bomb testing in the 50's and 60's didn't take care of the problem...?
Posted by: Clankazoid | February 28, 2011 at 08:06 PM
I learned a long time ago to stop worrying and love the bomb.
Posted by: LeDud | February 28, 2011 at 10:33 PM
Ride 'em cowboy.
Posted by: Loudmouth | March 01, 2011 at 07:18 AM
Gentlemen! We must not have! A mineshaft gap!
Posted by: Buck Turgidson | March 01, 2011 at 07:22 AM
"unprecedented climate change"? Well, let's just ask Mr. Dinosaur about that, shall we?
Posted by: Steve | March 01, 2011 at 09:53 AM