DOG BREED OF THE WEEK SO FAR
(Thanks to Mark Schlesinger)
« Previous | Main | Next »
(Thanks to Mark Schlesinger)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
can the 'Xoloitzcuintli-oodle' be far behind?
Posted by: sandy | January 28, 2011 at 09:51 AM
J-Lo eat's green tea?
Posted by: Dad-O-Lot | January 28, 2011 at 10:23 AM
I hear they are quite fond of tepesquintle. They were both teased in grade school because of their names. The tepesquintle is tastier though.
Posted by: WVplantman | January 28, 2011 at 10:34 AM
Pronounced "show-low-eats-queen-tlee". Hmmm. Either there're lots of Queen Tlee's, or only one Show Low.
Posted by: wiredog | January 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM
Queen must be rather happy.
Queenie???
Posted by: Siouxie | January 28, 2011 at 10:51 AM
Sandy and how long before Paris Hilton gets one??
Posted by: Siouxie | January 28, 2011 at 10:53 AM
**Snork** @ sandy
Posted by: nannie | January 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM
They're just trying to cheat at Scrabble.
Posted by: Chris S. | January 28, 2011 at 11:45 AM
So true Chris S. I hate it when I play Scrabble and people spell out this and the name of that volcano in Iceland, Eyjafjallajökull. Thank goodness for the copy and paste feature on computers.
Posted by: nursecindy | January 28, 2011 at 01:23 PM
There should be a rule in Scrabble that one cannot spell a word one cannot pronounce. Therefore, in playing drunken Scrabble, one would be limited to words of one, or fewer, syllables.
Posted by: Steve | January 28, 2011 at 02:05 PM
"The principal characteristic of the hairless variety is the absence of hair" Glad this was cleared up.
Posted by: Jan Crozier | January 29, 2011 at 11:03 AM
I thought "Xoloitzcuintli" was the new Astrological sign...?
Posted by: Russ Heeschen | January 29, 2011 at 08:30 PM