WE NEVER THOUGHT WE WOULD LIVE TO SEE THIS DAY
Kimberly-Clark rolls out tube-free Scott toilet paper
(Thanks to Chuck Cody and John Regan)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
October 27, 2010
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Preschool art teachers all over the country are screaming "NOOOOOOOOoooooooooo!!!!!"
Posted by: bonmot | October 27, 2010 at 04:07 PM
cats should just love it...
Posted by: queensbee | October 27, 2010 at 04:19 PM
So at the end of the roll there is nothing?
Exiszential.
Posted by: Cheesewiz | October 27, 2010 at 04:20 PM
Well I can certainly visit the little old mans room with much more joy now.
Posted by: oldfatguy | October 27, 2010 at 04:28 PM
You wait and see--they'll wipe the competition!
Posted by: Phil | October 27, 2010 at 04:41 PM
Sure, they can eliminate the tube, but low-flush will plague us forever.
Posted by: klezmerphan | October 27, 2010 at 04:53 PM
gee, now we can't do this...
Posted by: sandy | October 27, 2010 at 04:58 PM
bonmot, that was my first thought. I have several lovely, collectible, objects d'art that my kids made with toilet paper rolls. If they also do away with yogurt containers and baby food jars there will be nothing left for them to work with.
Posted by: nursecindy | October 27, 2010 at 05:19 PM
"Stagnant" is not the aroma of toilet paper.
Unfortunately, the brand is Scotts. I've only bought it once. Then I told my wife I had discovered what the sandpaper factory did on off days.
Maybe I'll give it a second chance. Let me get some ointment.
Posted by: Steve | October 27, 2010 at 05:39 PM
Following the enviro/sensitive - paper or plastic phase out, can "bring your own napkin" be far beh(_i_)nd?
Posted by: OC Dolphin | October 27, 2010 at 05:41 PM
I will never be able to complete my glider to escape from Luft Stalag 112B now. -- Ripping Yarns.
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | October 27, 2010 at 06:12 PM
Is it another sign of the upcoming Apocalypse?
Posted by: EB | October 27, 2010 at 06:21 PM
they are a good reminder I will be buying more even sooner now
what would I do without reminders?
Posted by: CrissyM | October 27, 2010 at 06:59 PM
What next -- tubeless toothpaste?
Posted by: Ralph | October 27, 2010 at 07:30 PM
moncler, if you want to fit in, say something stupid. That's the way it works.
TP 40% recycled from what?? My only hope is it would be congressional bills.
Posted by: Loudmouth | October 27, 2010 at 09:57 PM
This idea has just got to go.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | October 27, 2010 at 10:50 PM
I remember my first tubeless radio...it had transistors. I'm pretty sure they would irritate the delicate nether areas, however.
Posted by: Betsy | October 27, 2010 at 11:48 PM
Tube free? Thought that was Paris Hilton's motto.
Posted by: hogsatemysister | October 28, 2010 at 04:54 AM
@Ralph:
Tubeless toothpaste
Posted by: wiredog | October 28, 2010 at 07:34 AM
Inventors: A challenge.
We have tubeless tires, now Tubeless Tiolet Paper.
Lets see you create:
Tubeless YouTube
Posted by: funny man | October 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM