THE SHRINKAGE DEFENSE
Man charged with indecent exposure argues his genitals not big enough to warrant a charge
(Thanks to Matt Filar and Chuck Cody)
« Previous | Main | Next »
Man charged with indecent exposure argues his genitals not big enough to warrant a charge
(Thanks to Matt Filar and Chuck Cody)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
"perhaps fearing his evidence wouldn't stand up in court"
Excellent reportage from Down Under -- so to speak.
Posted by: Betsy | October 27, 2010 at 03:50 PM
Not Toowoomba, really.
Posted by: bonmot | October 27, 2010 at 03:55 PM
his evidence wouldn't stand up in court
The person who wrote this article would fit right in with this blog.
Posted by: Layzeeboy | October 27, 2010 at 04:02 PM
If his evidence won't stand up, he's unlikely to get off. He won't slip through the cracks of justice this time.
Posted by: padraig | October 27, 2010 at 04:40 PM
Guess it wasn't a
fell-on-kneefelony.Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | October 27, 2010 at 04:47 PM
If the genitals are small then it's only a misdewiener.
Posted by: Suzie Q. Wacvet | October 27, 2010 at 05:35 PM
Ladies, I hear he's single.
OT but I think I've found how to get rich and I want to share the news.
It seems that every other commercial I see says that this insurance company can save me hundreds of dollars over all the others. Then another company makes the same claim. Then another, ad nauseam.
I figure if I change insurance enough, after maybe 6 or 7 changes, they'll be paying ME. If I only change insurance once a month, I'll be set for life!
Anybody else want to try it? After all, the ads don't lie.
Posted by: Steve | October 27, 2010 at 05:52 PM
Is that wacky Brett Favre at it again?
Posted by: Steve Haller | October 27, 2010 at 06:36 PM
undiscoverable =wipe that from the dictionary.
Posted by: CrissyM | October 27, 2010 at 07:12 PM
He had an itsy bitsy, teeny weeny
That he showed to the pubman that day
He had an itsy bitsy, teeny weeny
Off to jail they took him that day.
Posted by: Loudmouth | October 27, 2010 at 09:27 PM
If da condom won't fit, you must acquit!
Posted by: Suzy Q | October 27, 2010 at 10:16 PM
Too small to be charged? It takes balls for a guy to use that as a defense.
Posted by: Wingnut | October 28, 2010 at 07:36 AM
It's not the meat
It's the motion
---lyrics from a famous Maria Muldair song
Posted by: funny man | October 28, 2010 at 10:56 AM
There once was a fellow named Rex
Whose organ was too small for sex.
When charged with exposure
he replied with composure,
"De minimus non curat lex.
Posted by: Howard from Broward | October 29, 2010 at 12:26 PM