UPDATE ON THE CANADIAN CRIME CRACKDOWN
They are not messing around up there.
(Thanks to the Perts)
« Previous | Main | Next »
(Thanks to the Perts)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Is "your swan won't migrate" a Canadian euphemism of some sort?
Posted by: Hammond Rye | August 09, 2010 at 11:46 AM
Trucks have legs? You Canadiuks do stuff weird.
Posted by: bonmot | August 09, 2010 at 12:08 PM
"eh, too brutus?"
Posted by: insomniac | August 09, 2010 at 12:10 PM
The swan better be careful, or he'll end up in Swantanamo Bay.
Maybe he could migrate if he grabbed onto the husk of a coconut?
Posted by: Punkin | August 09, 2010 at 12:10 PM
'et tu much to fly, Brutus?
(I would think a Canadian winter would be enough to make anyone head south.)
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | August 09, 2010 at 12:10 PM
First class journalism and I loved the photo of the landowner showing Brutus the legal papers.
Posted by: MOTW | August 09, 2010 at 12:16 PM
This is disturbing. I had the same thought as bonmot. I also didn't know that trucks had legs. Perhaps it's a Canadian thing.
Posted by: nursecindy | August 09, 2010 at 12:19 PM
Right, MOTW, how silly: they'll never get his cygneture.
Posted by: trustf8 | August 09, 2010 at 12:21 PM
Does this apply to mothers-in-law?
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | August 09, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Brilliant minds think alike, nc.
Posted by: bonmot | August 09, 2010 at 12:32 PM
Is this his swan song?
Posted by: Layzeeboy | August 09, 2010 at 12:37 PM
If their cars have boots, why can't their trucks have legs?
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | August 09, 2010 at 12:45 PM
I have a machete I can let him borrow. Brutus chop chop for din din.
Posted by: Siouxie | August 09, 2010 at 12:59 PM
He should file eviction papers with the local constabulary to show that he is doing his due diligence to get the swan to migrate.
Posted by: Dad-O-Lot | August 09, 2010 at 01:06 PM
Apparently it's easier for the authorities to persecute, er, prosecute, the landowner because if they just did the sensible thing and sent the animal control people after the swan Brutus would kick their asses for them.
He did break a trucker's leg, after all.
Probably ought to send Brutus to Canada's Parliament. And then Congress.
Posted by: Wes S. | August 09, 2010 at 02:02 PM
i'm off to canada. i don't know where they got it, but them boys have been smokin' some potent stuff.
Posted by: mudstuffin | August 09, 2010 at 02:19 PM
Make sure Larry David doesn't get near the place...
Posted by: Coconuts | August 09, 2010 at 02:50 PM
Canada's Migratory Birds Convention Act, amended in 1994, defines swans as migratory birds in Section 2, Article 1 (1). The fact that the swan doesn't migrate is irrelevant to the legal definition; legislators are not required to use common sense. The law also defines "possession" as a person having a bird or part of it "...in any place... for their own use or benefit...." Since this is apparently a one-man swan, it is evidently possessed.
The problem for the game cops is that if they let this one go, others will claim that their wildlife is "just visiting." It's the old excuse of "But officer, I'm not fishing, I was just taking this cute worm on my hook for a swim. He's free to leave at any time."
Posted by: Ralph | August 09, 2010 at 04:09 PM
The law also defines "possession" as a person having a bird or part of it "...in any place... for their own use or benefit.."
Since Brutus has Mr. Maieron running around tending his bum leg, taking care of his legal affairs, etc., it would seem that Brutus is the one receiving the benefit, and Maieron the one posessed.
Posted by: mm | August 09, 2010 at 07:58 PM