ATTENTION, PULITZER JUDGES
(Thanks to RussellMc)
« Previous | Main | Next »
June 28, 2010
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
to quote bonmot: 'arsenal?'
Posted by: trustf8 | June 28, 2010 at 04:50 PM
I have no desire to know the dimensions of my backside. I have even less desire to know the dimensions of her backside. I would like to know her I.Q. I'm thinking it's in the double digit range.
Posted by: nursecindy | June 28, 2010 at 05:25 PM
Why is she famous? Did she write a book?
Posted by: bonmot | June 28, 2010 at 05:33 PM
Who knew a big butt could make one a celebutard? Oh, maybe it was the sex tape...
Posted by: Coconuts | June 28, 2010 at 05:37 PM
"You're going to need bigger calipers."
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | June 28, 2010 at 07:41 PM
I'm sorry but even that sterling example of world class journalism could stimulate any interest in.....what was her name again?
Posted by: Steve | June 28, 2010 at 09:10 PM
There's a Pulitzer category for usin' a tape measure?
Hu gnu?
Posted by: O the U(manity) | June 28, 2010 at 11:47 PM
So this is what's going to replace newspapers?
Posted by: Betsy | June 29, 2010 at 12:11 AM
Old joke (much like KimKay)-
A survey of married women found that:
-79% thought their ass was too big
-%12 thought their ass was too small
-%9 said they didn't care what size he was, they would have married him anyway.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | June 29, 2010 at 12:15 AM
Sir Mix Alot got something to say
Posted by: Loudmouth | June 29, 2010 at 06:58 AM