« Previous | Main | Next »
March 26, 2010
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-« Previous | Main | Next »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
The noive!
Eh?
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | March 26, 2010 at 08:14 AM
Right, and I suppose there's a rule against that too!
Posted by: Romeo Vitelli | March 26, 2010 at 09:08 AM
Romeo...AGAIN???
Mommmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!
Posted by: Siouxie | March 26, 2010 at 09:47 AM
time to stop drinking, all the writing's slanty on the blog!
Posted by: insomniac | March 26, 2010 at 10:21 AM
Settle down. It's a ban against boos.
Posted by: JEC666 | March 26, 2010 at 11:54 AM
Looks straight to me...
Posted by: Chris S. | March 26, 2010 at 01:21 PM
Or not.
Posted by: Chris S. | March 26, 2010 at 01:22 PM
"So, Nanook, I heard your wife's been cuckolding you."
"Eh. It's no skin off my nose."
Which just goes to show, you can't have your kayak and heat it, too.
Posted by: bonmot | March 26, 2010 at 04:00 PM
Joe Biden was at the meeting... ?
Posted by: Clankazoid | March 26, 2010 at 04:02 PM
Frozen Daiquiri anyone? Eskimo pie-eyed.
Posted by: Loudmouth | March 26, 2010 at 10:27 PM
Does anyone else see the absurdity of a ban on booze in Canada? That would be like banning it in Wisconsin.
Posted by: Dirk | March 28, 2010 at 01:52 PM