AFTER-SCHOOL JOB OF THE WEEK SO FAR
(Thanks to Chuck Cody)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
November 22, 2009
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Dude, I'd spit in your face for free!
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | November 22, 2009 at 09:21 AM
Phlegm at 11:00.
Posted by: SW | November 22, 2009 at 10:59 AM
What? The kid wanted $50 or no deal.
If the kid had wanted $200 would it have been Felony Child Annoyance?
It goes without saying, of course, that both Misdemeanor Child Annoyance and Felony Child Annoyance WBAGNFARB.
Posted by: ScottMGS | November 22, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Sheesh. That's spittin' distance from my house.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | November 22, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Annie, he's probably single.
Posted by: SW | November 22, 2009 at 11:58 AM
They arrested him? But think how many jobs he created or saved!
Posted by: SW | November 22, 2009 at 12:05 PM
SW, Siouxie's already placed dibs on this one. Sorry Annie.
Posted by: nursecindy | November 22, 2009 at 12:25 PM
They'll argue over who has to pay whom. Or who gets to pay whom. It like that old joke --
Q: What did the sadist say to the masochist when the masochist asked her to beat him?
A: No.
Posted by: SW | November 22, 2009 at 01:14 PM
*snork* at 'phlegm at 11'
what's the 'street name' for spitting in someone's face? in my day we called it an 'earl weaver' (geezer baseball reference)...
Posted by: insomniac | November 22, 2009 at 01:27 PM
*Wonders what the statute of limitations is for Child Annoyance*
Just curious....
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | November 22, 2009 at 01:45 PM
Wait, it's against the law in California to annoy a child but they get off scot-free?
Besides, it is the honor-bound duty of all good parents to annoy their children.
However, this guy sounds like a special case. Those kids are going to need therapy if they aren't told to start making fun of him immediately.
Posted by: Steve | November 22, 2009 at 01:49 PM
Maybe this is what we call "mentally fond" at EXTREME
"Mentally fond" is the same as "mentally OUCHH"
Posted by: Cris Marshall | November 22, 2009 at 02:31 PM
It really something very shocking, and what did he get to make him spit. ?? just for $31..
Posted by: short jokes | November 23, 2009 at 02:01 AM