Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
June 22, 2009
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I think I need to get out my tinfoil cap now . . .
Posted by: Mahatma Kane Jeeves | June 22, 2009 at 10:08 AM
WTF?? Didn't these idiots watch the ABC movie last night??
Posted by: Steve Haller | June 22, 2009 at 10:13 AM
Careful, MKJ. They're watching this blog, you know....
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | June 22, 2009 at 10:18 AM
is contrary to space law prohibiting environmental modification of celestial bodies.
Does this mean Jessica Alba can't have a boob job?
Posted by: Mot the Hoople | June 22, 2009 at 10:24 AM
I, for one, welcome our lunar overlords. (I saw that movie last night - we're doomed!)
Posted by: Siouxie | June 22, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Bomb The Moon WBAGNFARB. Just sayin'
Posted by: Steve (The 24 Guy) | June 22, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Seems to me like they could use a more creative and friendly name for this mission. Anyone have any ideas?
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | June 22, 2009 at 10:32 AM
Meanie how about the 'Buddy Bomb'?
Posted by: nursecindy | June 22, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Webre is clearly a wing-nut. Why would NASA bother with such an expensive mission when they can do it for so much less on a soundstage like the first moon landing in 1969. And, what with all the advances in SFX since then, it'll be spectacular!
MtB: The rocket should be named "Buddy" (obviously) but the bomb part would have to be named "Alice" (geezer alert).
Posted by: Lairbo | June 22, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Well, of all things! Huh.
Posted by: Margaritaville | June 22, 2009 at 10:49 AM
I thought we already bombed the Moon.
Posted by: Mitch | June 22, 2009 at 11:05 AM
someone got it wrong. we're supposed to moon the bomb.
Posted by: crossgirl | June 22, 2009 at 11:18 AM
This is RIDICULOUS.
*Sits back and waits for imminent Tidal Waves of Death.*
Posted by: Guin | June 22, 2009 at 11:48 AM
A NASA illustration of the planned mission.
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | June 22, 2009 at 12:41 PM
Wait a sec, how will this impact my new iPhone 3Gs? Examining minds want to know.
Posted by: Boo Augustus | June 22, 2009 at 12:59 PM
I will go along with a moon bombing if we do it with a giant pumpkin chucker. Because that would be cool. Plus I get to yank the cord that sets it off. And write my name on the pumpkin.
Posted by: padraig | June 22, 2009 at 02:24 PM
Guin, I am SO with you.
pad - So long as you don't mean "Punkin."
Lairbo - hand over the keys to the Geezer Bus, please.
Posted by: Diva | June 22, 2009 at 05:31 PM
PLEASE! Let's go back to putting "BOOBS on the Moon".
Putting Bombs on the Moon just isn't as good.
signed,
Moon
P.S. It's only one letter, I know, but all the paperwork has already been done for "Boobs on the Moon"
Posted by: Moon | June 22, 2009 at 06:52 PM
Diva: Okay, I'll hand over the keys, but I call shotgun!
Posted by: Lairbo | June 22, 2009 at 08:15 PM
Extraterrestrials on the dark side of the moon??! Who can see them?
Posted by: cleofas | June 22, 2009 at 09:35 PM