TULSA
(Thanks to Rich Klinzman)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
May 28, 2009
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Westward expansion.
Posted by: NotSherly | May 28, 2009 at 04:20 PM
Must be the rodeos.
Posted by: NotSherly | May 28, 2009 at 04:24 PM
Boston can just put a red sock on it.
Posted by: Cheesewiz | May 28, 2009 at 04:27 PM
cheesewiiz - That's why they call him Big Papi.
Posted by: Punkin Poo | May 28, 2009 at 04:30 PM
You'd think with all them oil derricks out there settin' a good example...
Posted by: padraig | May 28, 2009 at 04:31 PM
'For when your corn is just not as high as you'd like it to be'
Posted by: trustf8 | May 28, 2009 at 04:33 PM
So maybe not EVERYTHING is bigger in Texas.
Posted by: KJP | May 28, 2009 at 04:34 PM
7 of the 10 "hardest" cities are in the Northeast. We're just full of manly men.
Posted by: Braniff | May 28, 2009 at 04:43 PM
Judging from the image on the "Not Yet" posting, none of the cities along the eastern seaboard should be on this list.
Posted by: Jumper | May 28, 2009 at 06:24 PM
I'm surprised no Northeast cities are on the list. I've heard it gets pretty cold there which would cause 'shrinkage' so you'd think they would need it.
Posted by: nursecindy | May 28, 2009 at 07:10 PM
We doan need no stinkin' vi@gra, cindy.
I see 5 of the 6 limpest cities are in Texahoma.
Interesting.
And I thought Alaska was the home of the "manliest" men. What happened?
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | May 28, 2009 at 07:17 PM
Providence RI was #11, followed by somebody I haven't found yet (12), Miami (13), and San José (14). I think I remember Yonkers was #15, but I have closed that window.
Minneapolis finished ahead of St Paul, and Tampa beat St Pete. They really wanted to have 100 cities, I guess.
Posted by: oneblankspace | May 28, 2009 at 07:40 PM
Wow, Texas placed three times. Guess that's as much action as they've seen in a while.
Posted by: Margaritaville | May 28, 2009 at 08:15 PM
Such a waste considering the town was built on the lubricant industry.
Posted by: Martinishark | May 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM
Whew, that Arlington entry had me concerned for a sec. Fortunately, it's not the Virginia one.
Posted by: Boo Augustus | May 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM
Well, that lends a whole new meaning to that old country song "Livin' on Tulsa Time..."
Posted by: Wes S. | May 29, 2009 at 01:06 AM
not everything are bigger in Texas ! .. :D
Posted by: Laura | May 29, 2009 at 05:01 AM
What's up, Tulsa?
Posted by: Loudmouth | May 29, 2009 at 08:33 AM
Boo, The VA Arlington is just limp wristed.
Posted by: Loudmouth | May 29, 2009 at 08:33 AM
.
' Men in Boston had the best sexual health, according to the ranking. '
Or the worst health insurance.
.
Posted by: cosanostradamus | May 29, 2009 at 09:51 AM