FASHION UPDATE
(Thanks to Danny)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
February 27, 2009
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Cousin IT?
Posted by: Siouxie | February 27, 2009 at 09:27 AM
They look like they're wearing lampshades. These fashion designers really don't like women do they?
Posted by: nursecindy | February 27, 2009 at 09:28 AM
these so called designers gotta get some different meds. good grief.
Posted by: queensbee | February 27, 2009 at 09:36 AM
I'm having a hard time understanding the business model behind this. Who, exactly, pays these people for either making these "clothes" for the models or the models for wearing them? It can't be because it makes them more attractive.
Posted by: Steve | February 27, 2009 at 09:39 AM
Not Cousin It. Gossamer, from the Warner Brothers cartoons.
Posted by: SharonCville | February 27, 2009 at 09:42 AM
Oh yeah, Sharon. You're absolutely right.
Gossamer
Posted by: Siouxie | February 27, 2009 at 09:46 AM
Steve, it isn't a business model. It's "Art." Just ask them.
In this case, it's stupid, ridiculous art, but that's just my humble opinion.
Posted by: SharonCville | February 27, 2009 at 09:52 AM
them's some mighty big granny panties.
Posted by: crossgirl | February 27, 2009 at 09:56 AM
It's not Art, it's Cousin It!!
Posted by: Guin | February 27, 2009 at 09:57 AM
One of these women will be seating right in front of me at the next concert or sporting event.
Posted by: Cheesewiz | February 27, 2009 at 09:57 AM
the one on the right looks like an aging, gray-haired version of Sweetums:
http://www.toymania.com/news/images/0604_sweetums.jpg
Posted by: The Penguin | February 27, 2009 at 09:58 AM
the one on the right looks like an aging, gray-haired version of Sweetums:
http://www.toymania.com/news/images/0604_sweetums.jpg
Posted by: The Penguin | February 27, 2009 at 09:59 AM
the one on the right looks like an aging, gray-haired version of Sweetums:
http://www.toymania.com/news/images/0604_sweetums.jpg
Posted by: The Penguin | February 27, 2009 at 09:59 AM
I think Charlie needs to get out more.
Posted by: ron | February 27, 2009 at 10:00 AM
Evidence yet again that they do not pay models enough. I mean, you couldn't pay me enough to wear those things.
Posted by: silver | February 27, 2009 at 10:24 AM
I don't think Jim Henson would have approved of his muppets eating models... Not enough flesh on the bones.
Posted by: Mrs. Wheezer | February 27, 2009 at 10:24 AM
OK Penguin. We get it. The bot hates you, and wants you to look stupid.
Posted by: wiredog | February 27, 2009 at 10:28 AM
I often marvel at how junk such as this is touted as "fashion" ... yet the only influence it really has is to appear as an obscurely random quasi-footnote to history, by being included in some crowd scene in a second-rate movie ... often, merely for the laughter it will invoke ...
Posted by: O the U(manity) | February 27, 2009 at 10:44 AM
For some unfathomable reason, (female version of the Healthy Penis?) the fashion business needs a government bailout.
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | February 27, 2009 at 12:30 PM
dang. i thought i had managed to escape the wrath of the bot...
Posted by: The Penguin | February 27, 2009 at 01:03 PM
Fashion, it's all about hookers.
Posted by: Horace LaBadie | February 27, 2009 at 01:15 PM
It's an old idea.
Posted by: Ralph | February 27, 2009 at 11:02 PM