TAKEN TO THE CLEANERS
We are referring, of course, to the American taxpayer. Again.
(Thanks to Cheryl Howard and "Jeff")
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
October 23, 2008
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
As I have said before, there is no problem that cannot be solved by the proper application of explosives/voltage.
Posted by: Hammond Rye | October 23, 2008 at 03:35 PM
Doesn't the court have more pressing matters? Anyway, I'm sure they'll iron it out.
Posted by: Layzeeboy | October 23, 2008 at 03:37 PM
Seems like the defendants could counter-sue based on frivolous litigation. Judges take a dim view of that.
Posted by: pogo | October 23, 2008 at 03:38 PM
To bad his legal briefs weren't. What a moron.
Posted by: Margaritaville | October 23, 2008 at 03:39 PM
What a friggin' tool!
Can we have him shot? Not sure on the rules about that sort of thing....
Posted by: Clark Kent | October 23, 2008 at 03:39 PM
Pretty starchy of him, though. I'm sure it will all come out in the wash.
Posted by: Hammond Rye | October 23, 2008 at 03:39 PM
INCOMING!!!
Posted by: Bellevue Hospital | October 23, 2008 at 03:39 PM
Hammie, he needs to just roll with the Tide, you know? It's not All about him.
Posted by: Diva | October 23, 2008 at 03:40 PM
The maroon thinks he has something to Gain. I hope the poor dry cleaner can Bounce back.
Posted by: random thunking | October 23, 2008 at 03:50 PM
I'm sure the court must have more pressing matters.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | October 23, 2008 at 03:51 PM
This guy is a stain on the judicial system.
Posted by: Joe the Blogger | October 23, 2008 at 04:14 PM
What a load of Cr@p.
Posted by: Cheryl Howard | October 23, 2008 at 04:23 PM
"Roy L. Pearson"?
or Ridley Pearson?
Washington, DC? The setting of Science Fair?
I'm just sayin'...
Posted by: Cat R | October 23, 2008 at 04:30 PM
Defense Lawyer: Your Honor, the Defense requests that this case be dismissed immediately and irrevocably, as the facts clearly indicate that the doctrine of Sphinctus Ignitas applies here.
Posted by: Meanie the Blue | October 23, 2008 at 05:51 PM
May I suggest a change of venue? Maybe have the Honorable Judge Judy hear this case?
The Dishonorable roy pearson deserves it.
(Yes, spellcheck, that's right. Proper nouns are to be capitalized)
Posted by: Chris S. | October 23, 2008 at 06:25 PM
Does this mean I can sue this dumbass for wearing a blue & burgandy colored suit?
Posted by: MartiniShark | October 23, 2008 at 07:02 PM
Martini,
Can we make that a class-action lawsuit? I'd be on board with you!
Posted by: frodolives | October 23, 2008 at 11:58 PM
Tar. Feathers. Judge Pearson.
Some assembly required.
Posted by: Wes S. | October 24, 2008 at 12:54 AM
Somebody give this @ss hat a freakin' pair o' pants and then (Siouxie) slap the cr@p out of him. And charge him $54 million for wasting the entire country's time. And I'm with Martini -- what an ugly suit (pun intended)!
Posted by: eilbeback | October 24, 2008 at 08:21 AM
It's scum sucking bottom feeders like this that give ambulance chasers a bad name.
Posted by: Davec | October 24, 2008 at 08:33 PM