« Previous | Main | Next »

July 31, 2008

LOL FINE IDEA

StupidFilter

(Thanks to Steve "The Other Steve" Lancaster)

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Unfortunately, ever message from my in-laws would be stopped and I wouldn't be able to discover the true truth about Citgo and Obama.

Tosses up a "y" after ever.

"If you can't say anything smart, don't say anything at all."
Hollywood and Washington DC are suddenly silent.

I can wish, can't I?

There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.

But I like reading the comments on this blog!

Great; another filter to clean out or change. This will cut into my time-wasting time.

Stupid Filter!?! Those guys rock!!

I personally think that -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- and that -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- -filtered- on a pony.

Hey, waitaminnit...

Can we do this with Bush's press conferences?

I won't use it until they find a way to administer electrical shocks to the sender. Keyed to them typing, for instance, "OMG!!!!!"

Actually, that would be two shocks: one for the OMG and another for multiple exclamation points.

The Random Stupidity Page would pretty much eliminate Bush's press conferences, Steve.

can we get the stupids to stop reproducing, too??

"You stupid humans! Stupid, stupid ... !"
-- Plan Nine From Outer Space

"Stupid is as stupid does"
-- Forrest Gump

My, we've come a long way, haven't we?

Best quote:
Isn't filtering stupidity elitist?

Yes. Yes, it is. That's sort of the whole point.

Think we can implement this on Weingarten's Blog Discussion Area at the Post?

Does this mean that I can haz cheeseburger will be completely blank?

I'm dubious given the fact the program did not filter out "progammatically". That's one of those $5 words like "paradigm" the stupids use to sound intellectualer than me. er, Than I

They're missing one key component -- match the contents against the samples found at snopes.com and bounce any hits. Still haven't quite trained my mother to check there before she forwards something to everybody she can think of.

They're missing one key component -- match the contents against the samples found at snopes.com and bounce any hits. Still haven't quite trained my mother to check there before she forwards something to everybody she can think of.

Bother!

That's my line, Richard.

Can this be used on the message boards at IMDb? Oh, pretty please?

The comments to this entry are closed.

-
 
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright | About The Miami Herald | Advertise