HEADLINE WRITER UNCLEAR ON THE CONCEPT
(Thanks to Paul Meyer)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
April 29, 2008
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Her motive was sex education. First!
Posted by: ... | April 29, 2008 at 05:01 PM
Nope, no way to figure out the motive.
Posted by: CJrun | April 29, 2008 at 05:06 PM
Surely the motive was to teach.
Posted by: Siouxie | April 29, 2008 at 05:08 PM
Clearly she grades on the curve ...
Posted by: Steve Haller | April 29, 2008 at 05:12 PM
I hear she's a very hand-on teacher.
Posted by: Siouxie | April 29, 2008 at 05:16 PM
She could be trying to be on an episode of Cops.
She's looking at some pretty serious jail time.
Posted by: Not My Usual Alias | April 29, 2008 at 05:19 PM
oh, duh. motive - boom chickaboom boom. duh.
Posted by: queensbee | April 29, 2008 at 05:30 PM
C'mon ... At least give us a hint...
Posted by: Account Deleted | April 29, 2008 at 05:47 PM
They were going to be on an HGTV show?
Posted by: Merri Lee | April 29, 2008 at 05:48 PM
physical ed. really physical
Posted by: Jazzzz | April 29, 2008 at 05:54 PM
Jazzzzzzie! with a bit of anatomy, no??
Posted by: Siouxie | April 29, 2008 at 05:58 PM
Si !!
Posted by: Jazzzz | April 29, 2008 at 06:04 PM
Special education teacher?? This is right up there on the list of most repugnant things I've ever come across.
Posted by: shell | April 29, 2008 at 07:02 PM
That article was painful to read, on so many levels.
This person is a teacher? The article made it through the editing department?
And I can't find a job.
Posted by: Cat R | April 29, 2008 at 07:12 PM
Headline writer has grammar unclear as well besides of major awkward-idity.
Posted by: Guin | April 29, 2008 at 07:18 PM
ditto, Cat! The problem wasn't the headline, it was the whole article AND the subject.
Posted by: daisymae | April 29, 2008 at 07:18 PM
Guin - I couldn't of said it more betterer my ownself.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 29, 2008 at 07:21 PM
I somewhat am pretty much so, are in agreablement, Guin and/or Annie.
Posted by: Siouxie | April 29, 2008 at 08:03 PM
It is of clarity to my personality.
Posted by: Meanie of the Bluishness | April 29, 2008 at 08:12 PM
What is this, National Talk Like Bush Day ??
Posted by: Steve Haller | April 29, 2008 at 08:28 PM
I resemble that remark.
Posted by: Dubya | April 29, 2008 at 08:34 PM
Heh! if the shoe fits on the other foot, Steve!
Posted by: Siouxie | April 29, 2008 at 08:55 PM
Dubya - that were worser than that there Vallley-speak from that other night.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 29, 2008 at 09:18 PM
CJ, the article stated at the end: go back. They blame her? Shampoo, rinse, repeat.
Posted by: JEC666 | April 30, 2008 at 12:12 AM
CJ, the article stated at the end: go back. They blame her? Shampoo, rinse, repeat.
Posted by: JEC666 | April 30, 2008 at 12:19 AM
Very high 'ick' factor on this one.
*Shudder*
Posted by: Betsy | April 30, 2008 at 01:11 AM