YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF WHY WE NEED A FEDERAL LAW REQUIRING HAMMERS TO CARRY A WARNING LABEL
It should state: DO NOT USE THIS HAMMER TO WHACK BULLETS
(Thanks to Jeff Meyerson)
« Previous | Main | Next »
It should state: DO NOT USE THIS HAMMER TO WHACK BULLETS
(Thanks to Jeff Meyerson)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Mallets work better
Posted by: Cheryl Howard | May 15, 2007 at 05:05 PM
Yeah, but you know, even if there was a label, someone would still sue the hammer maker because there wasn't anything specifically in place to prevent such usage.
Posted by: Schadeboy | May 15, 2007 at 05:11 PM
Two words: target range.
Posted by: WriterDude | May 15, 2007 at 05:16 PM
BRILLIANT!!!
Posted by: Siouxie | May 15, 2007 at 05:17 PM
I'm willing to bet he'll need to whack more than a few more bullets to pay that hospital bill. Stupidity never pays.
Posted by: Bethie | May 15, 2007 at 05:20 PM
For the love of god, people, how much more senseless violence must we endure before we finally pass some comprehensive Vise Control laws in this country??
Oh, the humanity!
Think Crink!
Posted by: Wender J. Crinklebank | May 15, 2007 at 05:24 PM
Missed the Darwin Awards by THIS much!!
Posted by: DeskDiva | May 15, 2007 at 05:39 PM
Missed the Darwin Awards by THIS much!!
Posted by: DeskDiva | May 15, 2007 at 05:41 PM
Jeff, if I didn't know you I'd have to, oh, I don't know, whack you with a hammer. I sent this in earlier, with a link from the Charlotte Observer.
At least it did get posted.
Posted by: Susan | May 15, 2007 at 05:52 PM
For the love of god and evolution, someone please add bleach to the gene pool.
Posted by: Meditrina | May 15, 2007 at 06:14 PM
1 in 100 ain't that bad.
Posted by: ubetcha | May 15, 2007 at 06:43 PM
Just brilliant!
Posted by: Artorios | May 15, 2007 at 07:12 PM
Sorry, Susan.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | May 15, 2007 at 07:15 PM
Susan, it's old news. Lab posted it on his blog hours ago. :)
Posted by: Eleanor | May 15, 2007 at 07:28 PM
I was gonna send this in (it was on CNN's main page). But then I thought, some knucklehead is sure to send it in.
And I was right.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | May 15, 2007 at 07:43 PM
Crink, your blog is funny - to say nothing of your dense dogs....
Posted by: Kathybear | May 15, 2007 at 07:45 PM
Don't mess with them weasels, neither.
Posted by: Elaine Sue | May 15, 2007 at 08:54 PM
But did anyone else read "hamsters" instead of "hammers."
Posted by: Boo Augustus | May 15, 2007 at 11:47 PM
key word "teen"
Posted by: mudstuffin | May 16, 2007 at 07:50 AM
Thanks, Annie! Always good to be appreciated by real fans.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | May 16, 2007 at 08:56 AM
ok, let's see, if I buy a case of 1000 bullets at $195 ...
If 100 bullets are "just a few pounds", 1000 bullets are 20-30 pounds. That would give me at the most $51.
Gonna need more bullets!
and a lot more ear plugs, band-aids, and aspirin.
Makes sense to me.
Posted by: beaniehampton | May 16, 2007 at 09:59 AM