WHY THE HELL ARE THEY WASTING IT ON MONKEYS AND SHREWS?
(Thanks to Howard from Broward)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
April 30, 2007
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Rump presentation? Like we have a choice, what whith all the sneakin' up you guys do...
Posted by: baligurl | April 30, 2007 at 05:08 PM
At least they didn't try it on squirrels.
Posted by: Mikey | April 30, 2007 at 05:08 PM
That's all we need. Rampant giraffe women.
Posted by: Dr Acula | April 30, 2007 at 05:08 PM
Rump presentation? Wait a minute have they been watching MTV?
Posted by: Mikey | April 30, 2007 at 05:09 PM
"...tongue-flicking and eyebrow-raising to the males, while female ...displayed their feelings via "rump presentation and tail wagging".
sounds like a RBR concert..
Posted by: russellmc | April 30, 2007 at 05:09 PM
maybe they wouldn't be such shrews if they go some once in awhile...
Posted by: mm | April 30, 2007 at 05:10 PM
maybe they wouldn't be such shrews if they got some once in awhile...
Posted by: mm | April 30, 2007 at 05:10 PM
"Unfortunately, scientists say the pill will come uith unwanted side effects that will make you wish you were just not having sex."
Posted by: Bethie | April 30, 2007 at 05:11 PM
stoopid bot
Posted by: mm | April 30, 2007 at 05:13 PM
??? Wine's not good enough?
*pant, pant, pant, trying to keep up with posts today*
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 30, 2007 at 05:14 PM
Annie, wine works for me.
Posted by: Siouxie | April 30, 2007 at 05:18 PM
Oh! Can we be like those red-a$$ed monkeys????
(Then my rash would fit right in)
Posted by: Punkin Poo | April 30, 2007 at 05:23 PM
that psychiatrist's a moron.
Posted by: judi | April 30, 2007 at 05:24 PM
Annie, panting works for me.
Posted by: CJrun | April 30, 2007 at 05:24 PM
Further research is clearly required. Could we slip some to Walter and see what happens?
Nevermind. Brain bleach line starts here, ladies & gents.
Posted by: Clean Hands | April 30, 2007 at 05:24 PM
and chocolates...
and strappy shoes...
and a very macho guy that whacks me over the head with lettuce... VERY hot!
Posted by: Siouxie | April 30, 2007 at 05:26 PM
It could be available to women within the next 10 years."
Dave, you'll be um...
an old fartmore mature and may need someViagra™vitamin supplements yourself.Posted by: Siouxie | April 30, 2007 at 05:31 PM
How are girls supposed to attract us guy without their humps, their humps, their lovely lady lumps?
Posted by: Chris | April 30, 2007 at 05:36 PM
How are girls supposed to attract us guys without their humps, their humps, their lovely lady lumps?
Posted by: Chris | April 30, 2007 at 05:37 PM
They tell us about it now, but expect us to wait 10 years for it?!
Yo, monkey, step back - that's MY stash!
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 30, 2007 at 05:44 PM
He said it may also be possible to develop a pill which worked for men, but he has so far not carried out any tests on male animals.
Guys have problems with their libido? Too much of one, maybe.
Posted by: almne | April 30, 2007 at 06:01 PM
almne - now look what you've done. Now all the guys are busy 'checking their libidos,' so to speak.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 30, 2007 at 06:06 PM
Oh, excuse me. I thought you said Tancredo.
Posted by: Stevie W | April 30, 2007 at 06:12 PM
Check your libido at the door, gentlemen.
No, not that way! Not in public, at least!
Crimus.
Posted by: Clean Hands | April 30, 2007 at 06:14 PM
but if i eat 1/3 less food, i'll lose my lovely lady "rump" (which currently attracts my male partner-husband-thing quite effectively)!! this pill seems suspect.
Posted by: fritchbeetle | April 30, 2007 at 06:14 PM
Wait Dave why do you care. I mean unless your saying you wife needs it, and that sounds suspiciously like at insult.
Posted by: Edgar Greenberg | April 30, 2007 at 06:27 PM
Uh I really mean unless you're saying your wife needs it, which sounds suspiciously like at insult
Posted by: Edgar Greenberg | April 30, 2007 at 06:28 PM
Uh I really, really mean unless you're saying your wife needs it, which sounds suspiciously like an insult.
I'm not doing too well.
Posted by: Edgar Greenberg | April 30, 2007 at 06:29 PM
EG - I can't believe you're calling Mrs. Blog fat.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 30, 2007 at 06:36 PM
Good thing Edgar is already dead.
Posted by: Punkin Poo | April 30, 2007 at 06:43 PM
Ok, who sat on Edgar and killed him?
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 30, 2007 at 06:51 PM
btw - nice segue, Punkin. Speaking of segways, whee!
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 30, 2007 at 06:55 PM
Just wonderin' about buying stock in this company.
Posted by: Wyo Cowboy | April 30, 2007 at 07:38 PM
Wyooooooo!
I know you love it when I do that. Everyone else is resting up for the upcoming '24' blogathon.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 30, 2007 at 07:41 PM
flattery will get you everywhere, Annie.
and yes, I'm sure the blog lines will clog soon. I'm settling in to watch some John Wayne. When 24 comes out on DVD, I'll watch it all. Got no cable, and little inclination to get it.
Posted by: Wyo Cowboy | April 30, 2007 at 07:55 PM
Wyo, I don't even have TV - it's too engrossing. I get little enough done as it is.
Posted by: ScottMGS | April 30, 2007 at 08:07 PM
You're missing a wonderful comedy, Wyo. Can't wait for the musical version - "Guys & Bombs."
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 30, 2007 at 08:08 PM
(Besides, it would interfere with blogging.)
Posted by: ScottMGS | April 30, 2007 at 08:09 PM
Annie sandwich!!!
Posted by: ScottMGS | April 30, 2007 at 08:10 PM
*hands ScottMGS a ceegar*
Annie, comments on this year's 24 seem to point to a series that's run its course.
Posted by: Wyo Cowboy | April 30, 2007 at 08:14 PM
The nice part about '24' is that you can make the same comments every dang week, and they're still apt. Thank you, '24' writers.
I usually write mine ahead of time. That way I can keep up with the east coasters.
Like this -
-Another perimeter? WTFBBQ?!
-Edgar is still...wait, this just in...dead.
-Victoria's Secret is duct tape.
-Subplot du jour, de la semaine, d'annee....ou est la nuke du suitcase?
-Thigh shot - drink!
repeat as needed.
and so on...
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 30, 2007 at 08:16 PM
My goodness but The Blog has been busy today. Is he between books or something?
Posted by: Jeannie | April 30, 2007 at 08:26 PM
and what VS links have you stored up for us tonight?
:)
Posted by: Wyo Cowboy | April 30, 2007 at 08:26 PM
I wonder how elements of 24 could individually indicate that the show has "jumped the shark"?
Posted by: ScottMGS | April 30, 2007 at 08:27 PM
You know you're sick of '24' when:
-You want Chloe to change her clothes...with Jack.
-One more perimeter or thigh shot, and I'm looking on ebay for a suitcase nuke.
-You're researching what freeway they're on just to stay awake...
feel free to continue - I gotta jump my work-shark....
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | April 30, 2007 at 08:33 PM
-plot elements repeat... again
-wooden dialog generator starts repeating, too
Posted by: ScottMGS | April 30, 2007 at 08:35 PM
*SNORK*
I'm so ready for/to laugh at 24.
Posted by: Deskdiva | April 30, 2007 at 08:44 PM
-wooden dialog generator starts spitting out particle board dialog.
Posted by: Punkin Poo | April 30, 2007 at 08:45 PM
I've tried the tongue flicking and eyebrow raising and I don't believe it would work, even with the meds they've got thos chimps on....
Posted by: Kathybear | April 30, 2007 at 09:52 PM
Toss an e up there...
Posted by: Kathybear | April 30, 2007 at 09:52 PM
EG - I can't believe you're calling Mrs. Blog fat.
I never did. I didn't say she needed it.
Posted by: Edgar Greenberg | April 30, 2007 at 11:38 PM
And now you're denying it. Sheesh.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | May 01, 2007 at 12:40 AM
So when I cave in and buy 24 on DVD, can I go back to the old blog entries for the corresponding air dates and have a multimedia experience? Kinda like "Dark Side of the Moon" and "The Wizard of Oz?"
Posted by: Stevie W | May 01, 2007 at 01:11 AM
*snork* @ Stevie. That is SUCH a great idea....
Posted by: Deskdiva | May 01, 2007 at 02:10 AM