VIRGINIA SCHOOLS: SOFT ON CRIME
Why weren't the police called?
(Thanks to Laura Fusco)
« Previous | Main | Next »
Why weren't the police called?
(Thanks to Laura Fusco)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Well duh, he was a Hungary student.
Jeremy Maitland was in the Hungary Creek Middle School kitchen one day last month filling a water cooler for a baseball game.
Posted by: snickers | June 05, 2006 at 01:22 PM
Oh, and -
First!
Posted by: snickers | June 05, 2006 at 01:24 PM
Why didn't he just blame the squirrels?
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | June 05, 2006 at 01:29 PM
I'm confused. Was the mother admitting that he ate the cookie and stole a laptop?
Posted by: KCSteve | June 05, 2006 at 01:29 PM
why would they call the police? they ran the poptart guy down with a minivan
Posted by: TC | June 05, 2006 at 01:30 PM
If found guilty, he will be forced to listen to 4 hours of Barry Manilow tunes.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | June 05, 2006 at 01:33 PM
Hey, take my laptop but keep your teen-aged mitts off of my HoHos!
Posted by: Mikey | June 05, 2006 at 01:35 PM
I'll bet the kid is kicking himself for not taking the whole jar of cookies.
Posted by: WoosterGirl | June 05, 2006 at 01:44 PM
Well he's older than 6; Clearly more than the police can handle. Newborns who cry to much get hard time. 6 Year olds are arrested as an example to everyone else. High schoolers are suspended. Beyond that you can do what you want and watch the police tase (taze?) themselves in an effort to stop you; No accountability and comic relief all in one.
Posted by: KOW | June 05, 2006 at 02:29 PM
Superintendent Fred Morton ... reviewed the case and found the school's decision reasonable.
So apparently there's no policy against lying.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | June 05, 2006 at 02:38 PM
the police should have been called to smack the principal upside the head.
Posted by: queensbee | June 05, 2006 at 02:43 PM
hmmmmmmmmm, i notice there isn't a father mentioned in this story either. verrrrrrrrrrrry suspicious.
Posted by: crossgirl | June 05, 2006 at 02:44 PM
I think the kid should be required to give back the cookie (in whatever form that may be) and the principal be required to eat it.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | June 05, 2006 at 02:49 PM
Something tells me the school officials in question have a problem with obesity. Nobody takes their cookies that seriously unless there are underlying issues.
Posted by: Somewhere North | June 05, 2006 at 02:58 PM
This incident will follow him forever, in ten years he will be denied admission to Yale, Harvard and Faber college all because of one Oreo.
Posted by: Juggler of Geese | June 05, 2006 at 03:11 PM
"Staff Member's Cookies" wbagnfarb and a cool euphemism for something, I'm sure......
Posted by: russell | June 05, 2006 at 03:33 PM
My kid's mp3 player was jacked from his car last week, and the school couldn't care less. And this idiot teacher is bitchin' about a cookie? Maybe he should get a different job.
Posted by: Olo Baggins of Bywater | June 05, 2006 at 03:44 PM
Now, had he parked his car in the kitchen...
Posted by: bob | June 05, 2006 at 03:59 PM
AND they kicked him off the baseball team!!!!!
I mean, C'mon.
private message to crossgirl: pssst, I like your comment - a lot.
Posted by: Eleanor | June 05, 2006 at 04:27 PM
I think the teacher and the principal both need to take a chill pill.
Make the kid replace the cookie, apologize to the teacher, and get on with his life.
WAAAAAY too dumb!
Posted by: Mikey | June 05, 2006 at 04:47 PM
I'm totally with Mikey on this one. Chill.
Posted by: Rocket | June 05, 2006 at 04:56 PM
Frankly, I subscribe to the "let the crime fit the punishment" school of thought in cases like this. If the "staff member" in question is OK with a punishment of suspension, that's OK. But the particular staff member better not leave any more food lying around, or get accustom to booger-flavored cookies (or worse, a lot worse).
Posted by: random thunking | June 05, 2006 at 05:27 PM
You just know the other kids are gonna make that "staff member" hate life. Which is fair.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | June 05, 2006 at 05:35 PM
"he ate a cookie after someone knocked over a cookie jar and he tried to pick them up."
What? He was so exhausted that he needed a sugar boost from TRYING to pick up cookies? How big were these cookies?
Posted by: Sondra | June 05, 2006 at 07:06 PM
Very, very fair, BJ.
Posted by: marfie | June 05, 2006 at 07:06 PM
Maybe the cookie was a $10 "special" cookie you know like a Hello Dolly Cookie in which case it would explain why the teacher was upset. I think the teacher and the kid should be tested.
Posted by: AlaskaMe | June 05, 2006 at 07:57 PM
Let's start a reading group. First we'll review the most recent dozen items about Crime and Punishment in Grammar School; then we'll read and discuss "Huckleberry Finn".
Posted by: Betsy | June 05, 2006 at 08:49 PM
Dudes, remember. Henrico County is the place where they were selling used iBooks and they started that melee that had people punched, groped, and kicked in the junk. This is a slow day for Henrico.
Posted by: Mister Smartypants | June 05, 2006 at 08:58 PM
So the cookies had to be picked up,probably off the floor, after the jar was knocked over. Better add a safe food handling violation to the sentence.
Posted by: shellann | June 05, 2006 at 10:27 PM
Henrico is also the county that gave every student and teacher a laptop a few years ago.
When I went to school in Henrico County, they didn't give me a laptop.
Oh, wait, that was in 1963. Never mind.
Posted by: rita | June 06, 2006 at 10:59 AM
I think he should be punished more because in the future he may think twice before he do something like that.......
Posted by: Wezzy | June 22, 2008 at 09:20 PM
I think he should be punished more because in the future he may think twice before he do something like that.......
Posted by: Wezzy | June 22, 2008 at 09:20 PM
I think he should have been punished more so in the future he will think twice before he steal
Posted by: Demar | June 22, 2008 at 09:22 PM