Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Since when do they let women in to the mens room to have to use a Urinal?
Posted by: Some_people_juggle_geese.™ | March 21, 2006 at 10:25 AM
One more social advance thanks to "Ally McBeal". ewhat's the deal with that show?
Posted by: MartiniShark | March 21, 2006 at 10:25 AM
This would be great for those damn hover-peeing women. Keep them out of the Ladies' Room, where real ladies SIT DOWN!
Posted by: Suzy Q | March 21, 2006 at 10:26 AM
I think the guy is peeing on his hands.
Posted by: fivver | March 21, 2006 at 10:27 AM
I've always wanted to sit in a urinal... in public, no less.
Really.
Posted by: Shaay | March 21, 2006 at 10:27 AM
I agree Suzy Q.
But I do have a small problem with hover-peeing
We have single person bathrooms at my hospital and I am forever entering the room right after one is in there, actually it is usually the same woman. And she never cleans the seat after her. Even when we post notes.
Posted by: Some_people_juggle_geese.™ | March 21, 2006 at 10:30 AM
Shaay - you can't fool me. You got the 'after' picture from an exploding whale story!
Posted by: fivver | March 21, 2006 at 10:30 AM
Oops. Wrong blog.
Posted by: fivver | March 21, 2006 at 10:31 AM
eww. i dont think so.
Posted by: queensbee | March 21, 2006 at 10:35 AM
But is there a spigot to wash your hands in there too? ...might as well go all out for the purest in minimalist design.
BTW can a lady give two shakes and walk away or isn't there residue requiring some paper wipage? This design was poorly thought through.
Posted by: Jones | March 21, 2006 at 10:37 AM
...from Yanko design... where form follows function...
in this case doesn't form precede function?
Posted by: insomniac | March 21, 2006 at 11:05 AM
Could be a problem a poo sneaks out though, huh?
Posted by: Christobol | March 21, 2006 at 11:08 AM
I think Mrs. Blog would have been happy to see this in Torino.
Posted by: Bill | March 21, 2006 at 11:09 AM
Hmmmm....a catch basin that allows BOTH sexes to pee..... isn't that called a TOILET?
Oh, and a big EEEEEWWWW! to the woman who sprinkles on the seat!
Posted by: Punkin Poo | March 21, 2006 at 11:10 AM
I'm pretty sure lady-model is about to pee on her shirt.
Posted by: Targetgirl | March 21, 2006 at 11:18 AM
We aim to please.
You aim, too, please.
Posted by: O. the U(manity) | March 21, 2006 at 11:18 AM
O the U.... the problem for me is actually that you don't aim! (editorial you that is, gerderally speaking) Eeeeeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwww!
Posted by: Bucket | March 21, 2006 at 11:47 AM
*Grrrrrrrr* "genderally"
Posted by: Bucket | March 21, 2006 at 11:48 AM
"semi-upright sitting (female) position"
I don't think she is actually in contact.
Posted by: Dr. Doug | March 21, 2006 at 11:54 AM
Dr. Doug - Doesn't matter. Slippery perimeter is dangerous enough......
Posted by: Bucket | March 21, 2006 at 11:55 AM
Bucket --
(Not argufyin', merely conversationaling)
Heck, at a certain age, some guys hafta "go" so often they could do it with their eyes closed ... um ... I know ... you're thinkin' that the age in question starts when they can first stand up in front of the stool ... nevermind ...
Posted by: O. the U(manity) | March 21, 2006 at 12:00 PM
O the U- all meant in the spirit of fondest teasing... ;-)
Posted by: Bucket | March 21, 2006 at 12:02 PM
I gnu that ...
Also ...
Prolly to the good fortune of most everybuddy else here, I resisted the temptation to discuss the various micturitionalistic behavior foibles of moi ownself ...
Posted by: O. the U(manity) | March 21, 2006 at 12:06 PM
Sorry, but the "sitting" figure does NOT look like a chick.
Also, what does a gal do when Aunt Flow comes to visit?
Posted by: happykat | March 21, 2006 at 12:07 PM
This could be a problem for short women like me. I couldn't possibly hover-pee over that thing.
Therefore, I am going to sue Yanko on behalf of all vertically-impaired people.
Posted by: Marie in Kourou | March 21, 2006 at 12:17 PM
Marie - Maybe it can be floor-mounted?
Posted by: Mr. Completely | March 21, 2006 at 01:18 PM
happykat, ewwwwwwwwwwww.
Posted by: crossgirl | March 21, 2006 at 01:29 PM
I think Happykat is right though, Plus, why didn't s/he pull down the tights to squat.
I have to remember to include a footstool in all the hospital bathrooms.
Posted by: Some_people_juggle_geese™ | March 21, 2006 at 01:35 PM
She didn't pull down her tights because she didn't want them to come in contact with the splatters left all over the rim from the previous hover-peeers. (Had to put in the extra "e" to discern from her peers). It has to be tough peeing with your tights still up, I would think. Anyway, they should make the idiot who came up with this try using it with their pants or pantyhose down around their knees. I suspect the photos would be much funnier.
Posted by: Flash | March 21, 2006 at 02:17 PM
Welcome to "America's Funniest Covert Videos!"
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | March 21, 2006 at 03:33 PM
Ahhhahahaha...
Posted by: angene15 | March 21, 2006 at 04:04 PM
so if you're found guilty of public urination are you tried by a jury of your peeers?
Posted by: insomniac | March 21, 2006 at 05:58 PM
Obviously invented by a man.
How many times do I have to tell you that we don't want to use men's bathrooms, we just want sufficient facilities for ourselves.
(ever notice there are rarely lines for the men's rooms?)
Posted by: daisymae | March 21, 2006 at 08:04 PM
snorks for Annie & Insom
Posted by: daisymae | March 21, 2006 at 08:05 PM
Yanko found a way to save two bucks by not buying a toilet seat. What next - blowdryers in the stalls?
Posted by: Sondra | March 21, 2006 at 10:13 PM
Don't you love the name "Yanko"?
Posted by: JP | March 21, 2006 at 11:53 PM
This was invented by a woman? (don't recall ever meeting a male type person being named Tamar, nttawwt) Somebody tell me where the line forms to slap the silly b***h, I want two turns, please.
........And to all hover-peeeeers, golly it would be a shame if you slipped on the stinky wet tiles and hurt something.
Coffee maker's broken, can you tell?
Posted by: Crabby Old Hag aka Dread | March 22, 2006 at 08:16 AM
"The Hover-Peeers" WBAGNFARB.
Posted by: Bill | March 22, 2006 at 12:48 PM
Bill, you are right, Hover-Peeeers wbagnfarb but I wouldn't want to see them in concert.
Posted by: Dread Hag | March 22, 2006 at 06:23 PM