STORY OF THE DAY FOR THE LADIES
They think this is news. Isn't that cute?
(Thanks to xmnr)
« Previous | Main | Next »
They think this is news. Isn't that cute?
(Thanks to xmnr)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I'll bet I'm not first.
Posted by: ScottMGS | January 24, 2006 at 01:46 PM
Whew. Since I live in Naperville, I have to worry about my size shrinking every day I'm in town.
Posted by: Dave R | January 24, 2006 at 01:46 PM
Scott Pitnick...Are we sure that isn't "Nitpick"?
Posted by: Betsy | January 24, 2006 at 01:47 PM
Hey! I was! And I even read the article! Could it be because I have such a large brain? Could I use any more exclamation points!?!
*wonders when first poster's club will contact me*
Posted by: ScottMGS | January 24, 2006 at 01:48 PM
judi: DUH!!!! *snork*
Scott: Standby for contact from FIRST Club! :)
Posted by: Eleanor | January 24, 2006 at 01:51 PM
Sigh... generations of women have known that for a long time. Mind you, its still a tough choice to make.
Posted by: Somewhere North | January 24, 2006 at 01:55 PM
Um, I done fergot whut I was gonna say. But ah got three dates tanight!
Posted by: Bill | January 24, 2006 at 02:02 PM
Scott - maybe you shouldn't draw attention to your large brain in a thread the topic of which is the inverse ratio between brain size and, um, the size of your dangly parts - unless that was your intent all along...NTTAWWT - just not a choice I would've made :)
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 02:03 PM
Wow, TCK - you're really smart!
*moving on*
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 24, 2006 at 02:05 PM
Annie - I'm hurt - that's quite possibly the meanest thing you've ever said to me!
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 02:07 PM
in fact, i'm dumb as a post, and as...
well, let's not go there
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 02:08 PM
MeThinks it goes to prove that those with bigger brains know how to handle their danglie bits better. After all, weren't they the ones with faithful females?
.... and why would they be faithful?
Satisfaction
enough said....
Posted by: kibby F5™ | January 24, 2006 at 02:12 PM
"There's an evolutionary trade off between intelligence and prowess"
What about the poor bastards who didn't make it into either line?
Posted by: Punkin Poo | January 24, 2006 at 02:12 PM
If I were smart enough, I'd be insulted and dejected by this news. Oh, crap. I am.
Posted by: everysandwich | January 24, 2006 at 02:13 PM
TCK - "Dumb as a post"? Wow! I'm impressed. Does Judi know?
Posted by: ScottMGS | January 24, 2006 at 02:13 PM
Kibby, you took the words right out of my mouth.
Posted by: cyan | January 24, 2006 at 02:15 PM
too late, TCK - you've exposed your true identity...and then some!
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 24, 2006 at 02:17 PM
In the interest of science, I am willing to participate in a survey to debunk this finding, by having a scientist give me a careful IQ test. She would then need to thoroughly measure my prowess.
But I am aware that this would amount merely to anecdotal evidence against the fallacy at hand. In statistics, one needs a sampling of about 2000 in order to establish a reasonable margin of error. A single measurement won't do.
The question, therefore, is whether we can find 1,999 other scientifically trained women training to similarly verify my relevant specifications.
--
Words of the Sentient:
Under a government which imprisons unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison.
-- Henry David Thoreau
Posted by: Kaz | January 24, 2006 at 02:23 PM
Scott Pinick = "Spit Cock Tint"
Posted by: mudstuffin | January 24, 2006 at 02:27 PM
Sorry, that's Scott PiTnick
Posted by: mudstuffin | January 24, 2006 at 02:28 PM
Scott - didn't you know? judi knows all and sees all
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 02:30 PM
There are no free lunches.
Would I then be considered a mutant if I am both smart and carrying 8.4% of my body mass in my cords? Wait, I'm posting to this blog, so, um nevermind on that first part.
Posted by: John | January 24, 2006 at 02:32 PM
Be careful who you Pit your Nicks with or you might find yourself without the Nicks to Pit with
Posted by: CoastRaven | January 24, 2006 at 02:35 PM
Key sentence -
"The relationship between the breeding system and relative brain size has received little investigation, said Pitnick..." Gee, I wonder why. I wish someone would give me lots of money to do a study - *trying to come up with my topic* How about why my dog always picks the weeniest guy in the room to try & hump. That should be worth lots and lots of $$$s.
Posted by: Kat | January 24, 2006 at 02:42 PM
Lets see - Batman was about 200 pounds - 8.6 percent of that errummm multiply by .086 - decimal point goes there... HOLY DANGLY BITS Batman!!! Adam West has a 17.2 pound schlong!!
Posted by: CoastRaven | January 24, 2006 at 02:44 PM
Hmm...Adam West.
Scroll down to black & white photo at page bottom. You be the judge.
Posted by: scat | January 24, 2006 at 02:50 PM
hee hee, Kaz said "fallacy at hand".
Posted by: kibby F5™ | January 24, 2006 at 02:53 PM
which post are you as dumb as, because we get some pretty dumb posts around here.
Posted by: ceeg22 | January 24, 2006 at 02:58 PM
ceeg22 -that would be this post
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 03:02 PM
TCK - Huh. That doesn't look like a post that has dreadful grammar and mediocre punctuation.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | January 24, 2006 at 03:06 PM
OK, so is this beat up on TCK day, cuz i checked my calendar, and it's not on there..
oh, and brainy, grammar and punctuation (and, as far as that goes, spelling) are, in my opinion, highly overrated
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 03:17 PM
I'm pretty sure that Tommy Lee proves the researchers' point.
Posted by: xxmnr | January 24, 2006 at 03:18 PM
*Wonders why we haven't heard from Brainy Jello.....*
And I'm confused on the significance of THIS - is it more bad noos for us intalekchulls, or whut?
Posted by: Blue Meanie | January 24, 2006 at 03:19 PM
Alright, I retract that.
Posted by: Blue Meanie | January 24, 2006 at 03:23 PM
Awwwww, TCK, I don't think you're smart!!
(pretty sure that's the first time that's ever been a compliment)
Now bring your little brain right on over here and sit next to me!
Posted by: sthnbelle | January 24, 2006 at 03:23 PM
Scat- HOLY PACKAGE, BATMAN!!
Literally! Is that? And peeking out from his leotard? Man, Adam clearly dresses left... *ahem*
*goes to look again*
No wonder the guy never seemed like the brightest bulb. Wow.
Posted by: Targetgirl | January 24, 2006 at 03:24 PM
CRaven, you beat me to it... You must be purdy smart. I would have beaten you to it, but I was using a slide rule.
*looks around nervously, crosses legs*
Posted by: random thunking | January 24, 2006 at 03:26 PM
OT: I just read Gene Weingarten's [very long] article on The Great Zucchini. Anyone else read it? I feel terribly conflicted about it.
Posted by: Tamara Rhymes With Camera | January 24, 2006 at 03:28 PM
Now over here we have exhibit A - Albert Einstein. Obviously intelligent, incredibly large brain but you can tell with the hair that he never did well with the women.
Exhibit B: Keifer Sutherland. Obviously a hit with the ladies but a little shy on the meaningful dialogue bit. That is why he has to resort to shooting and lately, stabbing. Because he couldn't come up with a witty reparte for the villians.
Most of the men on the blog have exhibited at least the ability to communicate in complete sentences so you'd better start dumbing yourselves down right away. I suggest massive infusions of K-Fed's Popozhao. At least 3 repeat playings should do the trick.
Posted by: Somewhere North | January 24, 2006 at 03:30 PM
sthnbelle - you always seem to show up right when I need you :)
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 03:31 PM
Here's my question.
Where does Jack Bauer rate according to the data indicated in this article? He's big on brains, but lousy in the relationship department.
But, hey, the guy saves the world a lot. Must count for something.
Posted by: R.T. Firefly | January 24, 2006 at 03:37 PM
I'm here for you, darlin'.
Posted by: sthnbelle | January 24, 2006 at 03:38 PM
To all you girl bats -
Your cheatin' hearts , boy bats have brung
To a dumb place, but man! we're hung
If you had stayed home, with one bat-mate
Our packages would hold less weight
But human girls still have a choice
If your man's 'nads make you rejoice
Get a new friend,with lots upstairs
Your cheatin' heart will run affairs!
Posted by: insomniac | January 24, 2006 at 03:38 PM
It occurs to me, in a completely unintelligent way, that the source of this post - xmnr - would have been a much funnier source for the Valentine's Day gift post.
Posted by: Blue Meanie | January 24, 2006 at 03:38 PM
My goodness! A 3 way with Insom and Blue Meanie!
(And when I was cooing at TCK - shame on me!)
Posted by: sthnbelle | January 24, 2006 at 03:40 PM
So, how did women's brains figure in the study? Were the women bats who were promiscious have smaller brains than the faithful women bats?
I'm in a quandry as to whether I should be leaning towards a Pamela Anderson/Brittany Spears/Madonna role model or a... a.... um.... well, someone else.
Posted by: Somewhere North | January 24, 2006 at 03:41 PM
You're here for us, darlin'! ;)
Posted by: Blue Meanie | January 24, 2006 at 03:42 PM
Somewhere North - if I had a brain in my head, I'd advise that you go with the "someone else" option
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 03:46 PM
Oh! And was there a direct link between the promiscious women bats and the size of their gazoombas?
Posted by: Somewhere North | January 24, 2006 at 03:46 PM
Good thing you're dumb as a post eh TCK?
Posted by: Somewhere North | January 24, 2006 at 03:47 PM
A couple of things. First, Holy Crap, Scat! (Heh,heh, crap and scat consecutively) There is a picture in your Batman collage that, no matter how much the "Ambiguously Gay Duo" exaggerated, they could not outdo. The picture of Batman and the boy wonder (wink, wink) climbing down the building would impress Robert Smigel. Secondly, it seems odd that the dumbest bats would have the largest testis making them more likely to reproduce. Why do they want more dumb bats. Thirdly and lastly, as an adult male with a college degee, (college is where all things dangly bits are compared, mocked, and revered) I have never considered, noticed, or cared about the size of my or any other guys' testis. The non-teste portion of dangly bits is what receives all the attention.
Posted by: Shredder | January 24, 2006 at 04:17 PM
Why are mostly men responding to this? I suspect that it's because likely most women have known this forever... or, at least since high school, where the jocks need help with their homework in order to stay in play...
Probably the "no free lunch" is applicable here... although it does give me a headache trying to figure out how...
Posted by: Stumped | January 24, 2006 at 04:17 PM
Ok, I've got two women convinced that I'm dumb as a post, and am just now wondering whether or not that was a good idea - hmmmm - maybe I really AM dumb as a post
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 04:26 PM
TCK - don't worry - you're not as dumb as you look...
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 24, 2006 at 04:34 PM
Right, Annie - he COULDN'T be as dumb as he looks.
(No offense, TCK. Want us to use smaller words or type slower?)
Posted by: Punkin Poo | January 24, 2006 at 04:38 PM
Punkin Poo - he's hiding under the bed again. Quick, get the broom!
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 24, 2006 at 04:47 PM
no offense taken punkin - i do, however, have something to show you and annie...
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 04:51 PM
I resemble that remark.
Posted by: ArcticAl | January 24, 2006 at 04:57 PM
oooh, a digital bouquet! Thanks, tck!
p.s. - I intentionally didn't capitalize your name. With our newly acquired information, I thought that was more appropriate. No offense or anything.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 24, 2006 at 05:01 PM
I can't believe no one has mentioned that The Dangly Bits WBAGNFAB. I guess the women are barely paying attention since none of this is news to us, and the guys are too busy worrying about whether they want to parade their incredible intellegence, or their incredible lack of intellegence, or just stay quietly in the corner on this one
Posted by: Muffles | January 24, 2006 at 05:04 PM
oops
*blushes furiously*
"Intelligence" (thus showing my lack?)
Posted by: Muffles | January 24, 2006 at 05:07 PM
If my brain is just nuts, can I be both smart and promiscuous?
Posted by: Coyote Osborne | January 24, 2006 at 05:41 PM
*thinking that maybe hiding quietly in the corner, or under the bed, would've been the way to go*
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 05:51 PM
right again, tck...jeez, you should be on Jeopardy.
Coyote Osborne - define "nuts".
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 24, 2006 at 07:16 PM
Annie - and I ask this purely out of concern for you - but are you OK? You seem a little, well, mean and vindictive today...
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 07:41 PM
Your exalted judi-ness, you are partially correct about this subject. It wasn't blogged when I sent it to you over a week ago. I was quite surprised it wasn't blogged and thought maybe I should resubmit. Glad to see it finally made the cut.
Posted by: Stupendous Man | January 24, 2006 at 07:43 PM
TCK, if you're feeling out of sorts cause Annie keeps picking on you, I hear that under Bumble's bed is available.
(you said so, Bumble!)
Posted by: southerngirl | January 24, 2006 at 07:54 PM
hey southerngirl - if yer here to take a shot at me too, go ahead - I can take it
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 08:01 PM
OK, now that I may have managed to piss off both southerngirl and Annie at the same time, I'm gonna go look for my lighter...
see ya
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 08:15 PM
tck - am I ok? let's see....3 years of divorce litigation (over $25,000 and counting), he quits his high-paying job so he doesn't have to pay child support and now he wants me to pay him spousal support...
I'm just fine, thanks for asking!
(btw - that 'not as dumb as you look' line was one of my dad's favorites. Sometimes we new yorkers have a nasty way of sayin' 'hi.' But humor is definitely my therapy lately.
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 24, 2006 at 08:18 PM
hey Annie - glad to hear you're OK - sorry about the other stuff - from now on, feel free to beat up on me as much as you like
oh, and about your ex - I know a guy that would take care of him permanently for a case of beer and a girly magazine - let me know
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 08:22 PM
TCK - You're the center of attention and you know you love it!!!! :-)
Posted by: Eleanor | January 24, 2006 at 08:22 PM
hey El - how come you know me so well? you haven't been talkin' to my mom, have you?
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 08:25 PM
Apologies, judi! Let me rephrase my previous post. I got confused reading down the threads. You didn't say this one may have been blogged before. Nonetheless, I submitted it sometime back from a different source than the link here, although it was almost word-for-word the same story. Glad to see it finally made it, although from the comments here, I'd say TCK wishes it hadn't.
Hey, AW-b-h, I always thought it was a case of lingering PMS. I'm not sure whether to say I'm happy it's not or I'm sorry it's not, if you get my drift. Don't worry, though. From the tone of your posts I'd say you've got your ex outnumbered one-to-one. Keep your chin(s?) up!
Posted by: Stupendous Man | January 24, 2006 at 08:33 PM
Aaaawww, that's why I love youse guys. You let me pound on you and come back for more. Thanks for taking it like men even when it had absolutely nothing to do with you. And to you, TCK, for having the courage to approach the fire-breathing princess head-on. Of course, that could just be stupidity in drag. ;)
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 24, 2006 at 08:41 PM
*snork*
Annie - did you just call me stupid? I knew you loved me best...
[and I'm serious about your ex - convince him to come to Montana on a hunting trip - you won't be disappointed]
Posted by: TCK | January 24, 2006 at 08:49 PM
Hey, Annie ~ girlfriend, TCK's been waiting all night for you to admit that he's stupid. You have so got it made now. Take advantage, ok?
Posted by: southerngirl | January 24, 2006 at 09:01 PM
Annie ... if he can't afford a hunting license in Montana, send him to Nodak ... lots of things are cheaper there ...
(goes back to quiet corner)
Posted by: U.O | January 24, 2006 at 09:18 PM
Annie - Send him up here. I could fix him up with my ex. Maybe they could go hunting together and freeze to death in a snow drift.
I've got you beat on the court case though. I just celebrated my 7th anniversary. I claim my lawyer as a dependent on my income tax.
Posted by: ArcticAl | January 24, 2006 at 09:41 PM
Oh, my...I leave for a quick dinner, and it's like "Divorce Court" meets "Laugh-In." Well, not really, but my analogy battery is low... just like my humor (badum!).
ArcticAl - so very sorry! I sent my attorney an anniversary card. She read it, and billed me for the time!
TCK - sorry I mistook you for an intelligent man - you are as dumb as a big, hard post.
U.O - staying in that quiet corner of yours is a good idea. I can tell you're very smart. ;)
Posted by: Annie Where-but-here | January 24, 2006 at 09:59 PM
Blue Meanie, I love "A Fish Called Wanda". Hubby & I frequently apologize by imitating John Cleese stating, "I apologize unreservedly". It always breaks the tension!
Posted by: scat | January 24, 2006 at 10:47 PM
"Bats invest an enormous amount in testis, and the investment has to come from somewhere. There are no free lunches," said Hoskens, who did not participate in the study."
Was that a bat named "Hoskens"?
Posted by: Dr. Doug | January 25, 2006 at 05:21 AM
Stupid me! Very very stupid me, if you know what I'm sayin', ladies.
Posted by: Poop Dogg | January 25, 2006 at 10:33 AM
Italics off?
Posted by: Mr. Completely | January 25, 2006 at 12:45 PM
apparently not.
Let's try that again.
Posted by: Mr. Completely | January 25, 2006 at 12:46 PM
better now?
Posted by: Mr. Completely | January 25, 2006 at 12:46 PM
OK, so am I the only one who is disturbed that out there somewhere someone is measuring bat testes???
Posted by: Karl | January 25, 2006 at 02:51 PM
". . . in bat species where the females are promiscuous, the males boasting the largest testicles also had the smallest brains. Conversely, where the females were faithful, the males had smaller testes and larger brains".
The sad part is, many men would still go for the tradeoff.
Posted by: Lmd33 | January 25, 2006 at 03:05 PM