THOSE EUROPEAN DESIGNERS
They are SO sophisticated.
(Via Gizmodo)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
November 16, 2005
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Give it up for: Taboo-charged Body Functions!
Posted by: MOTW | November 16, 2005 at 11:31 AM
Next thing you know, they'll be marketing toys that look like hoo-ha's and nutsacks.
Posted by: Leetie | November 16, 2005 at 11:35 AM
"... create cuddly toys that do not disgust or shock people, but attract and tempt them."
Sounds like the artist is trying to look thru a dog's eyes.
Posted by: MOTW | November 16, 2005 at 11:35 AM
My 31-year-old son will love them.
Posted by: rita | November 16, 2005 at 11:36 AM
And to think, my mom used to yell at me when I played with my food. Sheesh.
Posted by: LabSpecimen | November 16, 2005 at 11:41 AM
Think that's bad? You should've seen the prototype for the diarrhea plush toy. In the end, they decided not to run with it. Too many small pieces.
Posted by: Funny Name | November 16, 2005 at 11:49 AM
wtf?
Posted by: queensbee | November 16, 2005 at 11:51 AM
Yet another reason to go EEEWWWWWWW!!!
Posted by: Aunt Nancy | November 16, 2005 at 11:57 AM
*looks forward to putting them together in his toilet at the next big party he throws - for artistic purposes - REALLY*
Posted by: kibby F5™ | November 16, 2005 at 11:58 AM
I got nuthin'. Except maybe.....Freak!
Posted by: southerngirl | November 16, 2005 at 12:01 PM
a toy turd - i'm speechless
Posted by: TCK | November 16, 2005 at 12:03 PM
LMAO@Leetie and Funny Name. It never ceases to amaze me how much funnier truth can be than fiction at times.
Posted by: KOW | November 16, 2005 at 12:16 PM
How many times have we seen these concepts recently:
Oral, anal, phalic? This trilogy seem to cycle here.
Posted by: Dr. Sigmund Freud | November 16, 2005 at 12:18 PM
Christmas gifts for the boss? Solved my shopping!
Posted by: Kilmeny | November 16, 2005 at 12:20 PM
Ooh, I wanta toy shaped like naughty bits! Oh wait, I have one, it's just attached to Mr Artchick. Luckily, he likes to share.
Posted by: Artchick | November 16, 2005 at 12:21 PM
Umm, okay, when I referred to "naughty bits" I was thinking of it in the Monty Python sense, otherwise, ewww...
Posted by: Artchick | November 16, 2005 at 12:32 PM
Didn't it bother anyone else that their word for 'pee' is 'kiss?'
Posted by: Brainy Jello | November 16, 2005 at 12:44 PM
My eleven year old son would probably love it, just for the gross factor. Unfortunately, so would my nine year old daughter!
Posted by: southerngirl | November 16, 2005 at 12:45 PM
If the 'poo' one makes a sound when you squeeze it, they should market it on this site. I'm sure it would sell out.
Posted by: Anonymous Bird of Prey | November 16, 2005 at 01:14 PM
Kibby, you'd fit in so well with my family.
Posted by: rita | November 16, 2005 at 01:23 PM
Am I the only one that has trouble with the idea of "cuddling up" with poo?
I have to admit, though, Kiss & Bajs would be a great name for a rock duo.
Posted by: Schadeboy | November 16, 2005 at 01:39 PM
Okay, what I want to know is what possessed the guy to make the transition from bodily functions to toy? How did that play in his mind? "Hmmm, I need a new idea for a plush toy. First I need to go to the bathroom. Then flush. Hey, 'flush' rhymes with 'plush'. I may be on to something here..."
MOTW: I could have gone the rest of my life without seeing that. As it is, I think you've actually shortened my life expectance.
Posted by: Mr. Completely | November 16, 2005 at 01:43 PM
My older daughter's school had a magician come in one day. He was talking about his invisible dog; he looked under the table and said "EEWW!! He left a big pile of poo under here!"
Then he reached under the table and brought out a handful of stuffed Winnie the Pooh toys.
Well, the kids thought it was funny.
Posted by: Aunt Nancy | November 16, 2005 at 01:52 PM
I think they make the naughty part ones already, but they aren't plush, as far as I know.
What other embarassing thing can we plushify to make it somehow "tempting and attractive". I am surpised he didn't make a vomit or snot version. Dibs on the ear wax doll!
Posted by: Prairie Dog | November 16, 2005 at 01:55 PM
apoologies, Mr-C.
Posted by: MOTW | November 16, 2005 at 03:03 PM
Mr. C ~ thanks. I had missed MOTW's link, but no, you had to point it out, and I had to look.
MOTW ~ eeeewwwww!
Posted by: southerngirl | November 16, 2005 at 03:04 PM
Apparently, Svenska (I think this was her idea) has watched too many reruns of the South Park "Mister Hankie, the Christmas Poo" episode.
Posted by: Stupendous Man | November 16, 2005 at 06:14 PM
Brainy stole my first thought regarding Kiss equating to pee.
My second, and even more disturbing thought came after reading postings referring to these as plushies. Who else was educated on the "plushie scene" via the TV show CSI? Now I'm picturing pee and poo as life-sized sexual fetishes at a plushie meeting.
New item please!
Posted by: Jacki | November 16, 2005 at 07:13 PM
Look everyone!
It's Kevin and Britney!!!!!!!!1
Posted by: louis gehrig | November 16, 2005 at 09:34 PM