TODAY'S UPDATE OF NEWS SPARKLERS FROM MYSORE
Things are pretty quiet.
« Previous | Main | Next »
Things are pretty quiet.
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 |
Bummer. I was looking forward to another mind-grabbing news sparkler from those wonderful folks of Mysore.
Posted by: SteveB | April 26, 2005 at 05:33 AM
wtfbbq!
Posted by: igloo | April 26, 2005 at 05:34 AM
no news is good news?
Posted by: cubie | April 26, 2005 at 05:35 AM
What? No Michael Jackson?
Posted by: Kevin | April 26, 2005 at 05:37 AM
Ooooo! Even better is that hillarious cartoon, "Babu's Banter"
Posted by: SteveB | April 26, 2005 at 05:37 AM
"Jack, this piece you did on slugs is really something."
"Thanks!"
"And by really something I mean it's garbage."
"You don't like it?"
"You didn't use any verbs, again."
"It's a style."
"It's crap. We're running nothing in its place."
Posted by: Christobol | April 26, 2005 at 05:39 AM
Steve: trout.
Posted by: Balanchine | April 26, 2005 at 05:40 AM
No updated post today
Posted by: Lou Bricant | April 26, 2005 at 05:42 AM
I'll have you know, Mr. Smartytrousers, that this piece is a brilliant insight into the void and nothingness experienced by the lower middle class citizens of Mysore due to the postmodernist slump and the onset of shows like 24, not to mention the Britney Spears pregnancy, which is the most important cultural event in the entire history of mankind including the invention of nasal spray.
I nominate it for the Pullet Surprise.
Posted by: Federal Duck | April 26, 2005 at 05:46 AM
These are the same folks who provide phone support for my computer.
Posted by: Trystan Shout | April 26, 2005 at 05:46 AM
An earlier News Sparkler:
"A prayer to the Goddess before war, a puja to the Goddess for blessings before war! What is wrong in it?"
Posted by: philintexas | April 26, 2005 at 05:48 AM
You would have thought they'd at least recycle an old Dave column or something, but no.
Did I really open that page for nothing? That's 1.5 seconds I'll never get back.
Posted by: D'Artagnan | April 26, 2005 at 05:48 AM
Mr. Kutcher is a distant cousin.
Posted by: austin martin | April 26, 2005 at 05:48 AM
no news sparkler updates, but this was on the news link:
"Ayyo, we may or may not need them. It makes no difference. At the stench of our clothes, they would go away. They will not come near."
Posted by: philintexas | April 26, 2005 at 05:50 AM
all the news that fits, they print. or not.
Posted by: queensbee | April 26, 2005 at 06:04 AM
Fed - do you write regulations for the IRS?
Posted by: brat | April 26, 2005 at 06:05 AM
i don't know about you, but mysore is itchy ... NTTAWWT.
Posted by: OriginalEnigma | April 26, 2005 at 06:05 AM
from the "Teaser" - this thigh-slapper:
"Mine day shift and my wife goes for night shift - only our ends meet, but not we"
Posted by: mudstuffin | April 26, 2005 at 06:06 AM
Fed - do you write regulations for the IRS?
Posted by: brat | April 26, 2005 at 06:07 AM
my language go for english so I make, but not sense.
Posted by: mudstuffin | April 26, 2005 at 06:08 AM
from "Lafline", this caption under a cartoon about gov. corruption....
"Actually we are ignoring all such corrupt practices being done under our nose. At present we are concentrating on the corrupt practices done in the regime of previous Govt."
SSDD
Posted by: Brat | April 26, 2005 at 06:13 AM
I find this lack of sparkling news alarming. Perhaps Bauer should investigate. It might have something to do with a nuclear football.
Posted by: Guin | April 26, 2005 at 06:15 AM
Mysore what?
After sitting all day....
After playing golf....
After 19 hours of vigorous sex....
Posted by: Higgy | April 26, 2005 at 06:22 AM
19 holes of vigorous golf? What, what?
Posted by: D'Artagnan | April 26, 2005 at 06:25 AM
19 holes?
Vigorous sex?
I thought this was a family blog?
Posted by: Di | April 26, 2005 at 06:35 AM
Now that's what I call news!
Posted by: Mr.Fishair | April 26, 2005 at 06:36 AM
19 holes?
Vigorous sex?
I thought this was a family blog?
Posted by: Di | April 26, 2005 at 06:37 AM
Finally - a website with the journalistic integrity to report, "We ain't got diddly!"
Posted by: Esther | April 26, 2005 at 06:39 AM
Yeah, sure DI.
You direct attention to Higgy and D'rampArt, while you quietly let me split your posts. (might be my new favorite euphemism)
Family blog, huh?
Suuure.
Posted by: Mr.Fishair | April 26, 2005 at 06:47 AM
*blushing*
Why Mr. Fishair, me? Quiet?
Never!
Posted by: Di | April 26, 2005 at 06:50 AM
I thought "MySore Tourism" was something, then I saw "Festivals of MySore".
Make up your own joke!
Posted by: sct72 | April 26, 2005 at 06:58 AM
Mysore is oozing.
Posted by: Leetie | April 26, 2005 at 07:37 AM
Sure is quiet out there ...
Yup. Too quiet ...
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:58 AM
It's apparently a slow news day elsewhere as well.
The "news" page on my ISP has the following:
Under "money": Andersen pays $65M
Under "tech": Andersen pays $65M
There is some hope, however ...
Under "sports": White Sox whip A's
[Close to an exciting "sparkler", but no cigar ...]
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 08:11 AM
♫
When the news is a bore and slow as a slug
That's Mysore
When the blog's on the mend and I break too much wind
That's Mysore
♫
Posted by: DeanMartin | April 26, 2005 at 08:30 AM
I stopped reading the Star of Mysore after they cancelled Marmaduke.
Posted by: lurker | April 26, 2005 at 08:37 AM
No Comment.
Posted by: Sarcasmo | April 26, 2005 at 08:47 AM
AUTHOR: Latest from Mysore
EMAIL: [email protected]
IP: 24.172.22.135
URL:
DATE: 04/26/2005 01:07:14 PM
AUTHOR: Latest from Mysore
EMAIL: [email protected]
IP: 24.172.22.135
URL:
DATE: 04/26/2005 01:07:14 PM
Posted by: Latest from Mysore | April 26, 2005 at 09:07 AM
I went looking around the paper's website, and came upon a sad bit of news: Swami Ranganathanandaji has passed away.
Posted by: ErnieG | April 26, 2005 at 09:13 AM
I love that paper! I wish our papers had no news... now that'd be something.
Posted by: penny | April 26, 2005 at 09:16 AM
"star of Mysore" = "foamy resorts"
Posted by: insomniac | April 26, 2005 at 09:39 AM
Dear Latest, me likey. Igloo, how'ed ya get the musical thingy?
Posted by: Cynthia | April 26, 2005 at 11:12 AM
Cynthia,
use bs4; for ♪
use ♫ for ♫
Thus ends the lesson.
Posted by: igloo | April 26, 2005 at 11:47 AM
Well, that lesson wasn't so hot.
Try this.
use the numerals 9834 preceeded by the &# and ending with a semicolon for the ♪
use the numerals 9835 preceeded by the &# and ending with a semicolon for the ♫
Posted by: igloo | April 26, 2005 at 11:52 AM
Federal Duck: I nominate the Putzpuller Prize.
Posted by: Candy Tutt | April 26, 2005 at 02:14 PM
bs;
Posted by: Eleanor | April 26, 2005 at 03:28 PM
igloo - i tried it and see my post above - the 4 disappeared and.....
Posted by: Eleanor | April 26, 2005 at 03:29 PM
♪
Posted by: Eleanor | April 26, 2005 at 03:31 PM
♫
Posted by: Eleanor | April 26, 2005 at 03:32 PM
igloo you are my hero!!!!!
Are there a whole bunch of those?
Sometime when you have absolutely nothing productive to do, or that you want to do, could you please e-mail me some!!!?????
♪♪♪♪♪♪
♫♫♫♫
Posted by: Eleanor | April 26, 2005 at 03:36 PM
My turn!
♪ ♫
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 07:21 PM
Testing
the9834;
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:22 PM
Too Cool!
Thanks Igloo
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 07:22 PM
testing?
&9834;
Posted by: u.o | April 26, 2005 at 07:25 PM
U.O - it's worded funny
ampersand number sign 9834 semicolon
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 07:26 PM
Apparently it doesn't work on a Mac ... whatever ...
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:27 PM
♪
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:29 PM
Tah Dah!!!
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 07:30 PM
U.O,
There's a one word name for a number sign, but I can't remember it and can't think of how to look up something like that.
Got a clue?
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 07:33 PM
COOL!
TNXTNXTNX!!! TO SONDRA!!!
SONDRA RULES!!!
('Cuz she took the time to coach a really old dog thru the steps ...)
(I know there's a bunch of those code numbers for that stuff, but I don't have that software on the mac, just on the desktop @ home, and I could write some of those down when I go home in 3 weeks, and check them out ... COOL ... )
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:33 PM
COOL!
TNXTNXTNX!!! TO SONDRA!!!
SONDRA RULES!!! (# = pound ... ???)
('Cuz she took the time to coach a really old dog thru the steps ...)
(I know there's a bunch of those code numbers for that stuff, but I don't have that software on the mac, just on the desktop @ home, and I could write some of those down when I go home in 3 weeks, and check them out ... COOL ... )
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:36 PM
Your Welcome
and I made a snide remark or funny comment, depending on how you look at it, on the end of the snail thread
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 07:37 PM
Well, we're certainly managing to stretch this thread out, aren't we?
(That first "COOL" one din't post the first time, so I added the bold and then they both posted ... whatever ...)
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:40 PM
yeeeaaaaahhhhhhhhh, but... it's along those lines, maybe Latin based - libra something?
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 07:40 PM
Funny remark ... never tooken it as anything else ...
and ...
not that I'd expect you to be counting, but (not "counting butts) I have been, and since I've stayed pretty strictly within those guidelines of yours, I've only had one double all day ...
It's a little clumsy, but I'd rather do an extra half-dozen keystrokes and take an extra 30 seconds (it's not as if we consider this a true chatroom, NEway, is it?) and just get single posts, than wait it out and provide further proof of what a computer doofus I really am ...
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:44 PM
BTW there's no need to explain, it's happened to me and I've seen several posts where the same thing must have happened to others.
I'm at a loss to understand why people act the way they do about typos and double posts and such. When humans and the internet are perfect, I'll expect explanations, until then, Hell's Bells, who's perfect?
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 07:46 PM
Yup!
I haven't googled the word yet, but the Lb. abbreviation for "pound" is from the Latin root for ... ??? ... and so that's the connection ...
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:47 PM
Libra is Spanish and Latin for pound
Yahoo can only think in terms of horoscopes, apparently
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 07:51 PM
Yup, again ...
I'd go nuts if I got excited about typos and such on the blog ...
what does burn my hide is the "professional word person" who supposedly knows better ... and those are not of the blogsters, they are in the stories linked, and therefore (theoretically) written by "professionals" ...
Librum (?) ... from Latin for "Scales" (the zodiac sign), or "weighing" or such (this is memory, not google ...) ... and the transfer to "pound" is an easy jump
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:52 PM
Ah, well. I remember seeing the word a couple of years ago. Great the way my memory works, I remember seeing the word, being excited to find it again, thinking "How could I have looked this up if I had wanted to?" but the word itself is gone. It'll come to me in a year or two, and I'll wonder why for days.
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 07:58 PM
Libra, -ae is another word for scales, which gave rise to librum, -i, pound, and thus the abbreviation lb. for pound, and the symbol £ for the pound sterling. It is the name of a zodiacal constellation, which in classical times was known instead as iugum ...
(Above from Google)
SO!
The old memory banks still work ... sometimes ...
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 07:58 PM
I'm such a stickler about grammer (except an occasional dangling preposition) that I won't read past the second one in anything, magazine article, novel, biography...
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 08:05 PM
Is "octothorpe" the word you're looking for for the # sign?
Posted by: another lurker | April 26, 2005 at 08:19 PM
Gawd, I dunno ... you tell us ...
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 08:24 PM
My Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English language with over 300,000 entries does not list octothorpe. Octo is eight in Latin based languages and the # sign has eight points, but....I don't think so...
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 08:27 PM
Yeah, Sondra ...
I know exactly what you mean about the turnoff in sloppy writing (in those places) ...
I quit reading a particular author (whom I had enjoyed muchly, up to that point) when I found a glaring error (using the metric system, and his bio was constantly pointing out that he was a "man of science") in a novel ...
When those things happen, it just destroys the credibility of the writer for me ... if they're that sloppy/careless/stupid, then how can I trust what they write?
HOWever, to be fair, I also wrote in the newspaper bidness for over 17 years, and I realize how easy it is for mistakes to creep into the text ... but that's what editors and proofreaders are for ...
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 08:32 PM
Octothorpe is telco jargon for the # sign. Just thought it might be what was in the back of someone's mind.
::resumes lurking::
Posted by: another lurker | April 26, 2005 at 08:33 PM
Asimov or Heinlein?
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 08:35 PM
a.l. -
That's cool ... neat-o to learn another word ... tnx
Sondra -
I also should p'haps clarify my own neologisms and creative usages ... most of the aberrations seen when I post are similar to what I used as the common vernacular whilst writing my personal column those years in journalism ... more relaxed, more fun ...
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 08:38 PM
Hey! Come Back Here! What's "telco jargon?"
Great! Now there's something else I don't know how to look up.
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 08:38 PM
Nope, I still re-read Asimov and Heinlein when I get the time ... some old favorites there ... as with many of my favorite writers ...
I'll send you an email on this i.d. ... dunno if I wanna put that out here in front of the world (he's still alive, and could be [apparently still is, his books keep selling] the fave of people here) ... too long a tale, also, for this space ...
Posted by: U.O | April 26, 2005 at 08:43 PM
I like typing in my Texas accent, occasionally.
Well, we have used this as a chat room, so I feel like I should say 'bye' before powering down.
Bye?
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 08:47 PM
::comes back just for Sondra::
Telco = telephone companies
Posted by: another lurker | April 26, 2005 at 08:53 PM
Another lurker,
Thank you. I suspected as much, thanks for confirming.
Posted by: Sondra | April 26, 2005 at 08:55 PM
Tsk......I was gone all day and y'all had FUN. (y'all being Sondra, U.O. & Elenor) now I gotta figure out musical thingy w/o help. Grrr. (no I can't reed, I can bearly right)
Posted by: Cynthia | April 26, 2005 at 10:02 PM
bs4;
bs4;
Posted by: Hmmm | April 27, 2005 at 01:27 AM
♪
Posted by: hmmagin | April 27, 2005 at 01:32 AM
♪ ♪ ♫ ♫ I sorta got it. Tnx igloo.
Posted by: Hey!!!! | April 27, 2005 at 01:39 AM