HEADLINE OF THE DAY
And potential sin of the decade.
(Thanks to the ever-watchful Leslie Paul Davies)
« Previous | Main | Next »
And potential sin of the decade.
(Thanks to the ever-watchful Leslie Paul Davies)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Talk about playing with fire!
Posted by: Brainy Jello | April 21, 2005 at 10:15 AM
Don't stand to close to this guy.
Posted by: christofer | April 21, 2005 at 10:19 AM
I would imagine the Pope's position on cybersquating would be the, well, the squatting position, of course. I mean, he's not gonna cybersquat while lying down is he?
Posted by: casey | April 21, 2005 at 10:21 AM
casey...not with his bad back, anyway.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | April 21, 2005 at 10:23 AM
>
Immediately, she regretted her choice of words.
Posted by: MM | April 21, 2005 at 10:23 AM
So in addition to being the head of the Catholic church, the Pope is also God's Rottweiler?
It begs the question: how big is his johnson?
Posted by: MOTW | April 21, 2005 at 10:24 AM
Naturally, he has also received some emails from the faithful accusing him of sinful internet activity.
Geez, sinful internet activity, who would have ever heard of that otherwise.
Posted by: D'Artagnan | April 21, 2005 at 10:25 AM
MTOW, I laughed so loud people in the office are staring.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | April 21, 2005 at 10:27 AM
MOTW, only his alterboy knows for sure.
*nervously awaits a lighning strike*
Posted by: random thunking | April 21, 2005 at 10:32 AM
dude had best watch out...he could become the Catholic version of Salmon Rushdie in Poland
Posted by: philintexas | April 21, 2005 at 10:36 AM
Knowing it probably wasn't right
A young man bought the pope's website.
He was heard to exclaim
As he shouted in pain,
"I didn't think God's Rottweiler would bite!"
Posted by: AcuZod | April 21, 2005 at 10:37 AM
Knowing it probably wasn't right
A young man bought the pope's website.
He was heard to explain
As he shouted in pain,
"I didn't think God's Rottweiler would bite!"
Posted by: AcuZod | April 21, 2005 at 10:38 AM
Odd. I don't recall clicking "post" on the first one.
Posted by: AcuZod | April 21, 2005 at 10:39 AM
motw,
you misused the phrase "begs the question".
"begging the question" (aka petitio principii) is the logical fallacy which means one is assuming what one is trying to prove.
what you REALLY meant to say, instead, is "raises the question".
I know this because it is one of the few days that I actually showed up for philosopy class back in college.
no charge - the first one's always free.
that is all.
Posted by: your friendly logic counselor | April 21, 2005 at 10:43 AM
*stands far away from MOTW*
Posted by: �LabSpecimen� | April 21, 2005 at 10:49 AM
Petitio principii, quid pro quo, habemus papam, ipso facto.
That is all for me.
Posted by: D'Artagnan | April 21, 2005 at 10:49 AM
E pluribus unim, Cogito erog sum, Ooy-ay Ill-way I-fray in the air-chay.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | April 21, 2005 at 10:53 AM
Fax no biscuits, on your dominoes, condominium sandra dee.
Posted by: Candy Tutt | April 21, 2005 at 10:57 AM
petitio principii=EPIC I IN POI RIP TIT
Posted by: igloo | April 21, 2005 at 10:59 AM
"Sin of the decade"
You weren't trying to start a competetion or anything, were ya judi?
Posted by: Christobol | April 21, 2005 at 11:05 AM
A couple years ago, a radio announcer was playing the march "Veni, Vidi, Vichi." He joked that it could have been "Veni, Vidi, Veggie" = "I came, I saw, I ate a salad." (Caesar, of course)
He was peppered by listeners that in Latin, the V is pronounced as a W, so it would have been "Weni, Widi, Wicky", which didn't sound like Noble Caesar. I e-mailed him that he should carry that logic a bit farther to include his joke "Weni, Widi, Wedgie" = "I came, I saw, I hitched up my toga."
Posted by: OTW-May | April 21, 2005 at 11:09 AM
Geeze this guy has alot of nerve...Some papal have no respect..
Posted by: Sean | April 21, 2005 at 11:15 AM
OTW-May
*snork* and *spew*
Petitio principii, quid pro quo, habemus papam, ipso facto.
And may I add:
ab initio
Posted by: Former Criminal Defense Attorney | April 21, 2005 at 11:25 AM
In some states, committing a local fellacy is illegal.
Posted by: D'Artagnan | April 21, 2005 at 11:51 AM
*starts singing*
♪ "We're all stars now, in the Pope Show..." ♪
Posted by: Alex | April 21, 2005 at 12:04 PM
clearly, Motw has not commited a Mistake of Identity but a Mistake of Attribute, making his modus operandi de Humour avoidable, but not void.
back me up El...
Posted by: Bangi_Sizzles | April 21, 2005 at 12:10 PM
No, it's just that MOTW's comment isn't logically fallic.
Posted by: Brainy Jello | April 21, 2005 at 12:14 PM
Wow, where did this huge handbasket come from? Wonder where it's going . . .
Posted by: MKJ | April 21, 2005 at 12:19 PM
MKJ,
I think you just bagged the question.
Posted by: igloo | April 21, 2005 at 12:23 PM
clearly, Motw has not commited a Mistake of Identity but a Mistake of Attribute, making his modus operandi de Humour avoidable, but not void.
Of course, bangi,
and
Res Ipsa Loquitor
Posted by: Eleanor | April 21, 2005 at 12:25 PM
Or, via Monty Python, maybe it was supposed to be Reni, Ridi, Retchie: "I came, I saw, I threw up."
OK, so it doesn't really work...so?
Posted by: Maximus | April 21, 2005 at 12:30 PM
Isn't MOTW a she ???
Just sayin' ...
Posted by: J���� | April 21, 2005 at 12:31 PM
what an absolute twat!
Posted by: begby | April 21, 2005 at 12:33 PM
oops... yes MOTW is a she, but she's funny and smart and therefore I wish she were a man.
freudian slip.
and El :
no i have not been drinking! Liquitor indeed!
(*hic*)
Posted by: Bangi_Sizzles | April 21, 2005 at 12:38 PM
"In fact, "begs the question" would mean "asks for the question" if it was understood literally."
... but when are legal terms to be taken literally ???
Posted by: J���� | April 21, 2005 at 12:39 PM
*looking around the thread*
So umm... who's begby callin' a twat ????
And Bangi - thts ok - we still luv u! I was jst hping tht I wsnt wrng!!! ;)
Posted by: J���� | April 21, 2005 at 12:44 PM
the law of non-contradiction states that it is not possible that I be BOTH "your friendly logic counselor" and NOT "your friendly logic counselor" at the same time and in the same context.
ergo, I choose to remain "your friendly logic counselor" for the forseeable future, or at least until this thread is bumped.
that is all.
Posted by: your friendly logic counselor | April 21, 2005 at 12:50 PM
Just, how do you expect people to understand what you are saying if you keep leaving out the vowels?
sigh
*shakes head*
teehee ;)
(((Just)))
Posted by: Bangi_Sizzles | April 21, 2005 at 12:52 PM
"Any decisions regarding the future of this domain will be routed through my devout Catholic grandmother."
hehe, i like this guy. what a way to get your 15 mins of fame.
Posted by: jamie the star wars nerdgirl | April 21, 2005 at 12:53 PM
I OBJECT!!
( to being confused by the friendly legal counselor)
Posted by: Bangi_Sizzles | April 21, 2005 at 12:57 PM
Jü§†®,
I think begby must have been making a self-reference. (Hisself, not myself.)
Posted by: qetzal | April 21, 2005 at 01:14 PM
MOTW - you thoughts betray you. You must have a "johnson fixation".
Posted by: DarthVaderJohnson | April 21, 2005 at 01:17 PM
From Rome comes the John Paul-succeder
To the chair of the throne of St. Peter
It took a few days
To name "Benoit Seize"
(His English name ruins the meter.)
Posted by: insomniac | April 21, 2005 at 02:32 PM
Hey insom -
I think you should put together a collection of all your linericks (not anagrams!) and
self-publish!
I could be your agent! There could be $$$$ in this!
You do save them, don't you???
Posted by: Eleanor | April 21, 2005 at 05:03 PM
I think she meant 'limericks'.
*ducks*
Posted by: D'Artagnan | April 21, 2005 at 05:05 PM
THAT'S IT!!!!!
I'm through!
D'Artagnan, don't EVER post after me AGAIN, do you hear!!!!!!
*rolls bowling ball and gets him in the shins*
Hooray for ME!!
*reads 3 times to check for spelling errors*
Posted by: Eleanor | April 21, 2005 at 05:19 PM
Hey friendly counselor,as the resident pompus prig around here, may I offer an observation?
It seems to me that you violated the law of non-contradiction. MOTW is a hero of the people and thus needs no friendly correction.
We take our chaos very seriously around here y'know.
Posted by: Deontologist of Peter's Crew | April 21, 2005 at 05:55 PM
hic et ubique?
(D'art' -- or ... fellating a local?)
Illegitimati non carborundum
Posted by: Roman Clue(less) | April 21, 2005 at 06:17 PM