NO, THANKS, WE DON'T NEED A BREAK
We'd really rather study.
(Thanks to several bloglits)
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Previous | Main | Next »
December 21, 2004
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
If it's in Ananova, it's gotta be true!
Posted by: jamester | December 21, 2004 at 11:44 AM
Wouldn't you know it.
Posted by: rita | December 21, 2004 at 11:55 AM
Auuugggggghhhh! I wrote the first one AFTER that one!
Posted by: rita | December 21, 2004 at 11:57 AM
It's happening to me, too, Jeff. I bet this one ends up above yours.
Posted by: rita | December 21, 2004 at 11:58 AM
I have not had any parfaits!
Posted by: rita | December 21, 2004 at 11:58 AM
Okay, I wrote "It's happening to me, too, Jeff" first. Then "wouldn't you know it". Then "auuggh", then the parfait one, before I even saw your post. But it does look planned, doesn't it?
I'm not as anal as I seem.
Okay, yes I am.
Posted by: rita | December 21, 2004 at 12:01 PM
Jeff - actually I was "improving" (as if such a thing were possible) a similiar observation by Frank Zappa about Rolling Stone magazine...
But what the hell, write it down and most people believe...
Posted by: jamester | December 21, 2004 at 12:02 PM
Jeff, that key line should have read:
"We want our staff to have a better grasp on the subject."
Posted by: punky brewster | December 21, 2004 at 12:02 PM
Upper street store Ramparts, commented: "Our staff are experienced with the industrial strength needs of our not-so-delicate clients. We screen applicants carefully, based on a number of important factors, not limited to how rounded their knowledge is. Yeah, that's it. Rounded knowledge. So this course is a perfect fit for our needs. We hope it helps the staff to snap to attention when assisting a client."
Posted by: MOTW | December 21, 2004 at 12:06 PM
Cap'n we're back in the Time Warp again! It's another of those forward and back worm holes Einstein predicted. Look! It's Shroedinger's cat!
Posted by: pogo | December 21, 2004 at 12:13 PM
and this course is for whom? the wearer -- or the remover????? hunh?
Posted by: queensbee | December 21, 2004 at 12:20 PM
Then there is the Wardrobe Malfunction method.
Posted by: pogo | December 21, 2004 at 01:39 PM
Wasn't this the main plot of that classic 60's beach movie "How to Stuff a Wild Bikini"? Except that it was in California not England and it was bikinis not bras and, oh nevermind.
Posted by: Lairbo | December 21, 2004 at 01:48 PM
Lairbo - plot? There was no stinkin' plot! Didn't need plot, had nubile young women in bikinis! Worked for Russ Meyer, too. Ah, those were the days...
Posted by: jamester | December 21, 2004 at 02:03 PM
Umm, Mad, I was expecting something other than what I got...
Posted by: sandy beach | December 21, 2004 at 02:24 PM
at the risk of lowering the excitement level considerably, it reminds me of Frank Costanza's dinnertime talk with George about cup sizes: 'you got your A, and your B...'
Posted by: insomniac | December 21, 2004 at 02:32 PM
What with the word "ramparts" meaning what it does now (to the likes of US, anyway) reruns of Dragnet and Adam-12 have a hilarious new subtext, not that they weren't already a laugh riot to begin with.
Posted by: Lairbo | December 21, 2004 at 02:35 PM
Was that Badge 714? (If you know what that was, I'll stop the Geezer Bus and let you on.)
Posted by: pogo | December 21, 2004 at 02:36 PM
I like breasts, and as such, i like things that hold breasts.
Thus, i love this topic.
I wonder what i'm gonna say about it.
Posted by: Psycho_Joe | December 21, 2004 at 02:38 PM
Yes, punky, a better GRASP on the SUBJECT.
I think that i'll get to work on grasping some
ramparts now.
Hmm, i don't have any.
(Come on ppl, they're not all gems)
Wardrobe malfunction method WBAGNFARB.
ok, so way off topic.
I'ma tell a joke, tell me what ya think.
I don't understand why someone would name their penis.
It just doesn't make sense.
It's like naming a spider monkey in the zoo.
You can call it anything you want, but it's gonna come whenever it wants to.
8>
Posted by: Psycho_Joe | December 21, 2004 at 02:46 PM
Pogo - Joe Friday.
What do I win? Moving up a row on the bus?
Posted by: jamester | December 21, 2004 at 02:54 PM
Psycho_Joe: I got your ramparts right here.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | December 21, 2004 at 04:07 PM
Gee Punky, I was thinking the key line should have read, "We want our staff to grab, gently squeeze, and maybe give a playful nip to the subject."
Posted by: Christobol | December 21, 2004 at 07:05 PM
" ... head of development ... "
How could you guys miss that one?
MOTW: Bad! Bad! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
pogo, stop the bus please ... it'll take me a while to get on board ...
What a fakey scenic atop the page for LAPD ... I mean ... okay, so I don't LIVE here, but I've spent almost five of the last 12 months here, and I've never seen the sky like that. Too (not to, or two) blue and too (not two, or to) clear.
Jeff M. -- whatever it was on that site has been removed ... oh well ...
Posted by: Uncle Omar | December 21, 2004 at 07:21 PM
heh! "a more rounded knowledge of the subject." heh.
"Dave's NOT here, Man!!!" (Oh sorry. We're done with those topics...)
Posted by: alanboss | December 21, 2004 at 07:55 PM
Pogo,
'Luudes' man, back up that geezer bus, I can't walk that far!
Posted by: steven | December 21, 2004 at 08:48 PM
Our Motto: We support women's Breasts
That is all.
Posted by: Sarcasmo | December 22, 2004 at 07:28 AM