FINALLY!
A major advance in the war on dog farts.
Key quote: "For a year, we said, 'No, that's stupid. Nobody would buy that for a dog.'"
(Thanks to John Dodds)
UPDATE: Rick Cablespeed notes that there is a similar product for humans.
« Previous | Main | Next »
A major advance in the war on dog farts.
Key quote: "For a year, we said, 'No, that's stupid. Nobody would buy that for a dog.'"
(Thanks to John Dodds)
UPDATE: Rick Cablespeed notes that there is a similar product for humans.
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
The first person to comment on dog farts is a dubious honor. I, uh, don't own a dog. Charcoal pants might work for other animals too...
Posted by: Hez | April 21, 2004 at 11:54 AM
first post!
They admitted blaming it on their dogs?
Posted by: crash | April 21, 2004 at 11:54 AM
DAMMIT so close.
Posted by: crash | April 21, 2004 at 11:54 AM
Wouldn't cork work just a well?
Posted by: BMX3 | April 21, 2004 at 11:55 AM
Wouldn't cork work just a well?
Posted by: BMX3 | April 21, 2004 at 11:56 AM
If they were cork, you couldn't throw them into the grill to add that distinct taste to your party's hamburgers.
Posted by: crash | April 21, 2004 at 11:58 AM
"It was during that project that he realized making charcoal-lined panties for dogs might just work."
How often do journalists get to use the phrase 'charcoal-lined panties for dogs'? Far too infrequently, I'm sure.
Posted by: TxGal | April 21, 2004 at 12:00 PM
It's like I've said all along...we Iowans have WAAAAAY too much spare time.
Posted by: Mac O'Roni | April 21, 2004 at 12:16 PM
Also very gassy dogs Mac.
Posted by: BarryFS | April 21, 2004 at 12:37 PM
"Charcoal lined panties", "G-strings"? Sounds a lot like women's garments. Are they really for dogs or could they possibly really be for all the ladies who are still in denial? HMMM?
Posted by: Con | April 21, 2004 at 12:39 PM
The ones for humans were proven in gulf combat. Wow. Although, you'd think there weould be much more to worry about than stinkers when fighting in Iraq - unless you're inside a tank, maybe. Me - I'd need Super Depends.
Posted by: nouti | April 21, 2004 at 01:06 PM
God invented farts so people would stay humble.
Posted by: jer | April 21, 2004 at 02:06 PM
They are for VERY ugly ladies Con.
Posted by: crash | April 21, 2004 at 02:07 PM
"My God! This really works!"
Posted by: crash | April 21, 2004 at 02:08 PM
Charcoal-Lined Panties wbagnfarb, if they were pretty secure about themselves.
Posted by: Jeff Meyerson | April 21, 2004 at 02:18 PM
Maybe the human ones were for special forces who needed to not have scent give them away? Altho I woudl think that the noise that most males makes while farting would alert everyone in a 20 mile radius to their position before the odor ever got a chance....
Posted by: looney girl | April 21, 2004 at 02:34 PM
Mac-
Not all people from Iowa have way too much free time on our hands. Just the people that make the news. Just another reason I'm proud to be an Iowan!!
Posted by: Tiffany | April 22, 2004 at 03:41 AM
"Flatulence is part of life!"
Frank Morosky, Flatulence Guru
One hates to think how Frank became a 'flatulence guru.'
"The average person expels gas 14 times every day."
Really? Imagine being the person in the white lab coat with a counter, clicking off another count for each gaseous expulsion. "What do you do for a living?" "I'm a Fart Counter."
Posted by: MOTW | April 22, 2004 at 03:47 AM
Looking over the Human Fart Protector site (gadzooks), I note there is a link for an audio welcome. I'm too frightened to find out what it is.
In fact, this whole thing has me feeling anxious. One good belch oughta cure it..
AmberM
Posted by: ambami | April 22, 2004 at 06:44 AM
"MATERIAL PROVEN IN GULF COMBAT! LIVES DEPEND ON IT!"
So, that's REALLY what's been killing our soldiers?
Posted by: Lmd33 | April 22, 2004 at 01:51 PM
jff
Posted by: misslily | November 18, 2004 at 03:16 AM