ATTENTION, NOBEL PRIZE JUDGES
Predictors of three-dimensional breast kinematics during bare-breasted running.
(Thanks to jon harris)
« Previous | Main | Next »
Predictors of three-dimensional breast kinematics during bare-breasted running.
(Thanks to jon harris)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
-Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 |
Our tax dollars at work -- scientists involved, logic absent.
Posted by: coscolo | May 02, 2013 at 02:48 PM
As a scientist, I freely admit I han't think of a valid scientific reason to study this. However, I congratulate the genius who thought of the idea.
Posted by: Allen at Division | May 02, 2013 at 02:56 PM
To make any judgement regarding their study I would need to review their video data, in slow motion, numerous times.
Posted by: WVplantman | May 02, 2013 at 03:06 PM
Wait - You mean the scientists that studied this were men? Who woodda thunk it?
Posted by: Ms. Flukey | May 02, 2013 at 03:22 PM
Conclusion: bigger boobs jiggle more. Gee, ya think?
Posted by: bonmot | May 02, 2013 at 04:36 PM
coscolo, in what way is logic absent? This was utterly brilliant. Getting paid to do what you love, and all that.
Posted by: Elon | May 02, 2013 at 04:42 PM
breast displacement, velocity, and acceleration
Bigger Bounces Better. Film at 11, $3.95/min.
Posted by: Loudmouth | May 02, 2013 at 10:32 PM
Funded by the William Jefferson Clinton Foundation.
Posted by: SW | May 03, 2013 at 02:50 AM
Their abstract should include: "Must be jelly, cause jam don't shake like that."
Posted by: Cheesewiz | May 03, 2013 at 10:58 AM